ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Digital Library logoTake a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.
A comparison between two paradigms of intelligent systems: an example
Full text PdfPdf (406 KB)
Source AFIPS Joint Computer Conferences archive
Proceedings of the June 13-16, 1977, national computer conference table of contents
Dallas, Texas
SESSION: Discrete mathematical models table of contents
Pages: 833-836  
Year of Publication: 1977
Author
Abraham Waksman  Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Sponsor
AFIPS : American Federation of Information Processing Societies
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 0,   Downloads (12 Months): 12,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1499402.1499555
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Almost all intelligent computer systems of the past decade could be characterized by the General Problem Solver (GPS) paradigm. This paradigm states that the intelligent system activity consists of two distinct elements considered as separate modules. The first module is the generalist, the general problem solver while the second module could be considered as its data base, consisting of facts about the universe of discourse.

Current research indicates that to bridge the gap between simple display of inference making ability and an actual complex world situation requires a shift in philosophical approach. A new approach which promises to overcome the major drawbacks of the old paradigm could be characterized as the Plan-Debug paradigm. Similar to the old paradigm it could also be characterized as consisting of two modules, the plan making module and the debugging module. Conceptually this paradigm states that in order to execute any task or solve a problem we need to start with a plan of action regardless how imperfect. Once we get stuck, we consult a specialist with a lot of knowledge about the particular situation.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Newell, Allen, "Artificial Intelligence and the Concept of Mind", in R. C. Shank (ed), Computer Models of Thought and Language, W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco, 1973.
 
2
Minsky, Marvin, "New Directions in Artificial Intelligence", a talk presented at IBM, San Jose, California, Summer 1976.