ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Evaluation of computer architectures via test programs
Full text PdfPdf (1.61 MB)
Source AFIPS Joint Computer Conferences archive
Proceedings of the June 13-16, 1977, national computer conference table of contents
Dallas, Texas
SESSION: Selection methods for a family of computer architectures table of contents
Pages 147-160  
Year of Publication: 1977
Authors
Samuel H. Fuller  Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Paul Shaman  Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
David Lamb  Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
William E. Burr  U.S. Army Electronics Command, Ft. Monmouth, New Jersey
Sponsor
AFIPS : American Federation of Information Processing Societies
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 1,   Downloads (12 Months): 9,   Citation Count: 4
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1499402.1499434
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This article presents the evaluation of the Computer Family Architecture (CFA) candidate architectures via a set of test programs. The measures used to rank the computer architectures were S, the size of the test program, and M and R, two measures designed to estimate the principal components contributing to the nominal execution speed of the architecture. Descriptions of the twelve test programs and definitions of the S, M, and R measures are included here. The statistical design of the assignment of test programs to programmers is also discussed. Each program was coded from two to four times on each machine to minimize the uncertainty due to programmer variability. The final results show that for all three measures (S, M, and R) the Interdata 8/32 is the superior architecture, followed closely by the PDP-11, and the IBM S/370 trailed by a significant margin.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
 
3
Bernwell, N. (editor), Benchmarking: Computer Evaluation and Measurement, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1975.
 
4
 
5
Fuller, S. F., W. E. Burr, P. Shaman, and D. Lamb: Evaluation of Computer Architectures via Test Programs. Volume III of Computer Family Architecture Selection Committee Final Report, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C., 1 December 1976.
 
6
 
7
Computer Review, GML Corporation, Lexington, Mass., 1976.
 
8
Stone, H. S. (editor), Introduction to Computer Architecture, Science Research Associates, Chicago, 1975.
 
9
Davies, O. L. (editor), Design and Analysis of Industrial Experiments, 2nd ed., Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh, 1971.
 
10
Anderson, V. L. and R. A. McLean, Design of Experiments, a Realistic Approach, Marcel Dekker; Inc., New York, 1974.
 
11
Connor, W. S. and M. Zelen, Fractional Factorial Experiment Designs for Factors at Three Levels, National Bureau of Standards, Applied Mathematics Series 54, 1959.
 
12
Rao, C. R., Linear Statistical Inference and its Applications, 2nd ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1973.
13
 
14
Box, G. E. P. and B. R. Cox, "An Analysis of Transformations", The Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, Vol. 26, 1964, pp. 211--252.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Samuel H. Fuller: colleagues
Paul Shaman: colleagues
David Lamb: colleagues
William E. Burr: colleagues