Is COBOL-8x cost effective?

ABSTRACT

The purpose of the study is to assess the estimated costs and benefits to the federal government that would result from adoption of the proposed revision of American National Standard COBOL as a Federal Information Processing Standard (FIPS). Potential benefits of $90.2 million have been identified, stemming primarily from improved productivity in both the development and maintenance of COBOL programs. Estimated costs of $17.9 million have been identified, arising principally from the effort needed to convert old COBOL programs to the new specification, which is incompatible in some respects with the current one. In support of the study, we conducted interviews with federal ADP managers and officials, and also analyzed more than one thousand federal COBOL programs for various syntactic characteristics.

REFERENCES

• 1: The Effects of Future Information Processing Technology on the Federal Government ADP Situation, A. D. Little, Inc., General Systems Group, Inc., Aurora Associates, Inc., NBS GCR 81--342, National Bureau of Standards, September 1981.
• 2: Gray, M. G. An Assessment and Forecast of ADP in the Federal Government, NBS Special Publication 500--79, Institute for Computer Sciences and Technology, Washington, D.C.: National Bureau of Standards, 1981.
• 3: Barry W. Boehm, Software Engineering Economics, Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1981
• 4: Comptroller General. Federal Agencies' Maintenance of Computer Programs: Expensive and Undermanaged. GAO, AFMD-81-25, Washington, D.C.: General Accounting Office, February 1981.
• 5: Bennet P. Lientz , E. Burton Swanson, Problems in application software maintenance, Communications of the ACM, v.24 n.11, p.763-769, Nov. 1981 [doi>10.1145/358790.358796]
• 6: FCSC. Federal Conversion Support Center Conversion Cost Model (Version 2), Office of Software Development, Report No. GSA/FCSC-82/001, Falls Church, Va.: General Services Administration, June 1, 1982.
• 7: Cugini, J. V. "Assessing the Impact of Revisions to Standards: the COBOL Example." Computers & Standards, 1 (1982),
• 8: Fiorello, M., and J. Cugini. Cost-Benefit Impact Study on the Adoption of the Draft Proposed Revised X3.23 American National Standard Programming Language COBOL, NBSIR 83-2639, Washington, D.C.: National Bureau of Standards, March 1983.