ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Quality-aware collaborative question answering: methods and evaluation
Full text PdfPdf (771 KB)
Source Web Search and Web Data Mining archive
Proceedings of the Second ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining table of contents
Barcelona, Spain
SESSION: User interaction table of contents
Pages 142-151  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-390-7
Authors
Maggy Anastasia Suryanto  Nanyang Technological University
Ee Peng Lim  Singapore Management University
Aixin Sun  Nanyang Technological University
Roger H. L. Chiang  College of Business, University of Cincinnati
Sponsors
SIGMOD: ACM Special Interest Group on Management of Data
: Google
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
SIGWEB: ACM Special Interest Group on Hypertext, Hypermedia, and Web
: Yahoo! Research
Microsoft : Microsoft
: Nokia
SIGKDD: ACM Special Interest Group on Knowledge Discovery in Data
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 20,   Downloads (12 Months): 209,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1498759.1498820
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Community Question Answering (QA) portals contain questions and answers contributed by hundreds of millions of users. These databases of questions and answers are of great value if they can be used directly to answer questions from any user. In this research, we address this collaborative QA task by drawing knowledge from the crowds in community QA portals such as Yahoo! Answers. Despite their popularity, it is well known that answers in community QA portals have unequal quality. We therefore propose a quality-aware framework to design methods that select answers from a community QA portal considering answer quality in addition to answer relevance. Besides using answer features for determining answer quality, we introduce several other quality-aware QA methods using answer quality derived from the expertise of answerers. Such expertise can be question independent or question dependent. We evaluate our proposed methods using a database of 95K questions and 537K answers obtained from Yahoo! Answers. Our experiments have shown that answer quality can improve QA performance significantly. Furthermore, question dependent expertise based methods are shown to outperform methods using answer features only. It is also found that there are also good answers not among the best answers identified by Yahoo! Answers users.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
3
4
 
5
6
7
 
8
H. T. Dang, J. Lin, and D. Kelly. Overview of the TREC 2006 Question Answering Track. In TREC, 2006.
 
9
Z. Gyöngyi, G. Koutrika, J. Pederson, and H. Garcia-Molina. Questioning Yahoo! Answers. In WWW, 2008.
10
 
11
J.-N. Hwang, S.-R. Lay, and A. Lippman. Nonparametric Multivariate Density Estimation: A Comparative Study. IEEE Transactions of Signal Processing, 42(10):2795--2810, 1994.
12
13
14
15
16
17
 
18
19
 
20
D. Moldovan, S. Harabagiu, R. Girju, P. Morarescu, F. Lacatusu, A. Novischi, A. Badulescu, and O. Bolohan. LCC Tools for Question Answering. In TREC, 2002.
21
 
22
E. Sneiders. Automated FAQ Answering: Continued Experience with Shallow Language Understanding. In AAAI, 1999.
 
23
I. Soboroff, A. P. de Vries, and N. Craswell. Overview of the TREC 2006 Enterprise Track. In TREC, 2006.
24
 
25
Xiaoyong and W. B. Croft. Finding Experts in Community-Based Question-Answering Services. In CIKM, 2005.
26
27

Collaborative Colleagues:
Maggy Anastasia Suryanto: colleagues
Ee Peng Lim: colleagues
Aixin Sun: colleagues
Roger H. L. Chiang: colleagues