Do learning styles influence the way students perceive interface agents?

ABSTRACT

This paper presents an interface agent, designed for a virtual learning environment, whose main capabilities are to communicate with users in natural language and to promote collaboration by inciting students to help each other. An experiment was carried out with 72 university students to assess the effectiveness of the interface agent regarding its ability to improve students' performance, to influence students' perception of their learning experience, and to involve students in collaborating with each other. Furthermore, the students were classified by their learning style, according to the Felder-Silverman model [6]. We then evaluated if different learning styles could produce different results because of the way students perceived the interface agent. The results of the experiment are presented here, as well as conclusions and direction for future work.

REFERENCES

• 1: Andre, E., Rist, T., and Muller, J. Employing AI methods to control the behavior of animated interface agents. Applied Artificial Intelligence, Volume 13, Numbers 4--5, May 1999, pp. 415--448.
• 2: Maryam Ashoori , Chunyan Miao , Yundong Cai, Socializing Pedagogical Agents for Personalization in Virtual Learning Environments, Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology - Workshops, p.346-349, November 02-05, 2007
• 3: Konstantinos Chorianopoulos , Diomidis Spinellis, Affective usability evaluation for an interactive music television channel, Computers in Entertainment (CIE), v.2 n.3, July 2004 [doi>10.1145/1027154.1027177]
• 4: Craig, S. D., Gholson, B. and Driscoll, D. M. Animated Pedagogical Agents in Multimedia Educational Environments. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2002, Vol. 94, No. 2, pp. 428--434.
• 5: De Angeli, A., Lynch, P. and Johnson, G. Personifying the e-market: A framework for social agents. In Proceedings of Interact 2001 - Eighth IFIP TC. 13 Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Tokyo, Japan, July 9--13, 2001.
• 6: Felder, R. M., Silverman, L. K. Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education. Engr. Education, v. 78, n. 7, p. 674--681, 1988. Available in: http://www.ncsu.edu/felder-public/Papers/LS-1988.pdf. Accessed in June, 2008.
• 7: Felder, R. M., Soloman, B. A. Learning Styles and Strategies. 2008. Available at: www2.ncsu.edu/unity/lockers/users/f/felder/public/ILSpage.html. Accessed in June, 2008.
• 8: Barbara Hayes-Roth , Patrick Doyle, Animate Characters, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, v.1 n.2, p.195-230, October 1998 [doi>10.1023/A:1010019818773]
• 9: Huitt, W. (2001). Motivation to learn: An overview. Educational Psychology Interactive. Valdosta, GA: Valdosta State University. Disponível em: http://chiron.valdosta.edu/whuitt/col/motivation/motivate.html
• 10: Kim, Y., Flann, N., Wei, Q., Ko, Y.; Alla, S. MathGirls: Motivating Girls to Learn Math through Pedagogical Agents. In E. Pearson & P. Bohman (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, 2006 (pp. 2025--2032). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
• 11: Kolb, D. Kolb learning styles. 2006. Available at: http://www.businessballs.com/kolblearningstyles.htm. Accessed in June, 2008.
• 12: Lester, J., Converse, S., Stone, B. A., Kahler, S. E., & Barlow, S. T. Animated pedagogical agents and problem-solving effectiveness: A large-scale empirical evaluation. In Proceedings of the Eighth World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Kobe, Japan, 1997.
• 13: Richard E. Mayer, Multimedia Learning, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 2001
• 14: Moreno, R., and Mayer, R. E. Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: The role of modality and contiguity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 1999, pp. 358--368.
• 15: Pandzic, I. S., Ostermann, J. and Millen, D. User Evaluation: Synthetic Talking Faces for Interactive Services. The Visual Computer, Springer Verlag, vol. 15. pp. 330--340. 1999.
• 16: R. W. Picard , S. Papert , W. Bender , B. Blumberg , C. Breazeal , D. Cavallo , T. Machover , M. Resnick , D. Roy , C. Strohecker, Affective Learning — A Manifesto, BT Technology Journal, v.22 n.4, p.253-269, October 2004 [doi>10.1023/B:BTTJ.0000047603.37042.33]
• 17: Raoul Rickenberg , Byron Reeves, The effects of animated characters on anxiety, task performance, and evaluations of user interfaces, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.49-56, April 01-06, 2000, The Hague, The Netherlands [doi>10.1145/332040.332406]
• 18: Riding, R. and Agrell, T. The effect of cognitive style and cognitive skill on school subject performance. Educational Studies, 23(2), 311--323. 1997.
• 19: Thompson, Bruce; Gloria M. Borrello (1986). Educational and Psychological Measurement. Construct Validity of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. SAGE Publications.
• 20: Vygotsky, L. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 1978.
• 21: Wallace, R. The Elements of AIML Style, ALICE A. I. Foundation. 2003.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.2 User Interfaces (D.2.2, H.1.2, I.3.6)

General Terms:
Experimentation, Human Factors

Keywords:
interface agents, recommender systems