ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Algorithms for distributional and adversarial pipelined filter ordering problems
Full text PdfPdf (995 KB)
Source
ACM Transactions on Algorithms (TALG) archive
Volume 5 ,  Issue 2  (March 2009) table of contents
Article No. 24  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISSN:1549-6325
Authors
Anne Condon  University of British Columbia
Amol Deshpande  University of Maryland, College Park, MD
Lisa Hellerstein  Polytechnic Institute of NYU
Ning Wu  Polytechnic Institute of NYU
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 10,   Downloads (12 Months): 147,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1497290.1497300
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Pipelined filter ordering is a central problem in database query optimization. The problem is to determine the optimal order in which to apply a given set of commutative filters (predicates) to a set of elements (the tuples of a relation), so as to find, as efficiently as possible, the tuples that satisfy all of the filters. Optimization of pipelined filter ordering has recently received renewed attention in the context of environments such as the Web, continuous high-speed data streams, and sensor networks. Pipelined filter ordering problems are also studied in areas such as fault detection and machine learning under names such as learning with attribute costs, minimum-sum set cover, and satisficing search. We present algorithms for two natural extensions of the classical pipelined filter ordering problem: (1) a distributional-type problem where the filters run in parallel and the goal is to maximize throughput, and (2) an adversarial-type problem where the goal is to minimize the expected value of multiplicative regret. We present two related algorithms for solving (1), both running in time O(n2), which improve on the O(n3 log n) algorithm of Kodialam. We use techniques from our algorithms for (1) to obtain an algorithm for (2).


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
3
 
4
 
5
Burge, J., Mungala, K., and Srivastava, U. 2005. Ordering pipelined query operators with precedence constraints. Tech. rep. 2005-40, Stanford University.
6
 
7
Coffman, E., and Mitrani, I. 1980. A characterization of waiting time performance realizable by single server queues. Oper. Res. 20, 810--821.
 
8
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
Fleischer, L., and Wayne, K. 2002. Fast and simple approximation schemes for generalized flow. Math. Program. 91, 2, 215--238.
 
14
Garey, M. 1973. Optimal task scheduling with precedence constraints. Discrete Math. 4, 37--56.
 
15
Gelenbe, E., and Mitrani, I. 1980. Analysis and Synthesis of Computer Systems. Academic Press.
16
 
17
Grigoriadis, M., and Khachiyan, L. 1994. Fast approximation schemes for convex programs with many blocks and coupling constraints. SIAM J. Optimiz. 4, 86--107.
18
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
Munagala, K., Babu, S., Motwani, R., and Widom, J. 2005. The pipelined set cover problem. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT), vol. 3363. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, 83--98.
23
 
24
 
25
Shayman, M., and Fernandez-Gaucherand, E. 2001. Risk-Sensitive decision-theoretic diagnosis. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 46, 1166--1171.
 
26
Simon, H., and Kadane, J. 1975. Optimal problem-solving search: All-or-None solutions. Artif. Intell. 6, 235--247.
 
27
28

Collaborative Colleagues:
Anne Condon: colleagues
Amol Deshpande: colleagues
Lisa Hellerstein: colleagues
Ning Wu: colleagues