ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Stream sampling for variance-optimal estimation of subset sums
Full text PdfPdf (508 KB)
Source Symposium on Discrete Algorithms archive
Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual ACM -SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms table of contents
New York, New York
Pages 1255-1264  
Year of Publication: 2009
Authors
Edith Cohen  AT&T Labs---Research, NJ
Nick Duffield  AT&T Labs---Research, NJ
Haim Kaplan  Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
Carsten Lund  AT&T Labs---Research, NJ
Mikkel Thorup  AT&T Labs---Research, NJ
Publisher
Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics  Philadelphia, PA, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 12,   Downloads (12 Months): 60,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

From a high volume stream of weighted items, we want to maintain a generic sample of a certain limited size k that we can later use to estimate the total weight of arbitrary subsets. This is the classic context of on-line reservoir sampling, thinking of the generic sample as a reservoir. We present an efficient reservoir sampling scheme, VarOptk, that dominates all previous schemes in terms of estimation quality. VarOptk provides variance optimal unbiased estimation of subset sums. More precisely, if we have seen n items of the stream, then for any subset size m, our scheme based on k samples minimizes the average variance over all subsets of size m. In fact, the optimality is against any off-line scheme with k samples tailored for the concrete set of items seen. In addition to optimal average variance, our scheme provides tighter worst-case bounds on the variance of particular subsets than previously possible. It is efficient, handling each new item of the stream in O(log k) time, which is optimal even on the word RAM. Finally, it is particularly well suited for combination of samples from different streams in a distributed setting.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
R. J. Adler, R. E. Feldman, and M. S. Taqqu. A Practical Guide to Heavy Tails. Birkhauser, 1998.
 
2
M. T. Chao. A general purpose unequal probability sampling plan. Biometrika, 69(3):653--656, 1982.
3
4
5
 
6
E. Cohen and H. Kaplan. Tighter estimation using bottom-k sketches. In Proceedings of the 34th VLDB Conference, 2008.
 
7
8
 
9
N. G. Duffield, C. Lund, and M. Thorup. Learn more, sample less: control of volume and variance in network measurements. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 51(5):1756--1775, 2005.
10
 
11
 
12
C. T. Fan, M. E. Muller, and I. Rezucha. Development of sampling plans by using sequential (item by item) selection techniques and digital computers. J. Amer. Stat. Assoc., 57:387--402, 1962.
 
13
D. G. Horvitz and D. J. Thompson. A generalization of sampling without replacement from a finite universe. J. Amer. Stat. Assoc., 47(260):663--685, 1952.
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
The Netflix Prize. http://www.netflixprize.com/.
 
19
 
20
C-E. Särndal, B. Swensson, and J. Wretman. Model Assisted Survey Sampling. Springer, 1992.
 
21
22
 
23
M. Szegedy and M. Thorup. On the variance of subset sum estimation. In Proc. 15th ESA, LNCS 4698, pages 75--86, 2007.
24
 
25
Y. Tillé. An elimination procedure for unequal probability sampling without replacement. Biometrika, 83(1):238--241, 1996.
 
26
Y. Tillé. Sampling Algorithms. 2006.
27


Collaborative Colleagues:
Edith Cohen: colleagues
Nick Duffield: colleagues
Haim Kaplan: colleagues
Carsten Lund: colleagues
Mikkel Thorup: colleagues