|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ABSTRACT
We consider the k-Directed Steiner Forest (k-DSF) problem: given a directed graph G = (V, E) with edge costs, a collection D ∈ V x V of ordered node pairs, and an integer k ≤ |D|, find a min-cost subgraph H of G that contains an st-path for (at least) k pairs (s, t) ∈ D. When k = |D|, we get the Directed Steiner Forest (DSF) problem. The best known approximation ratios for these problems are: Õ(k2/3) for k-DSF by Charikar et al. [2], and O(k1/2+ε) for DSF by Chekuri et al. [3]. For DSF we give an O(nε·min {n4/5,m2/3})-approximation scheme using a novel LP-relaxation seeking to connect pairs via "cheap" paths. This is the first sublinear (in terms of n = |V|) approximation ratio for the problem. For k-DSF we give a simple greedy O(k1/2+ε)-approximation scheme, improving the best known ratio Õ(k2/3) by Charikar et al. [2], and (almost) matching, in terms of k, the best ratio known for the undirected variant [11]. Even when used for the particular case DSF, our algorithm favorably compares to the one of [3], which repeatedly solves linear programs, and uses complex time and space consuming transformations. REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
INDEX TERMS
Primary Classification:
Additional Classification:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||