|
ABSTRACT
One of the most famous and investigated lossless data-compression schemes is the one introduced by Lempel and Ziv about 30 years ago [37]. This compression scheme is known as "dictionary-based compressor" and consists of squeezing an input string by replacing some of its substrings with (shorter) codewords which are actually pointers to a dictionary of phrases built as the string is processed. Surprisingly enough, although many fundamental results are nowadays known about the speed and effectiveness of this compression process (see e.g. [23, 28] and references therein), "we are not aware of any parsing scheme that achieves optimality when the LZ77-dictionary is in use under any constraint on the codewords other than being of equal length" [28, pag. 159]. Here optimality means to achieve the minimum number of bits in compressing each individual input string, without any assumption on its generating source. In this paper we investigate three issues pertaining to the bit-complexity of LZ-based compressors, and we design algorithms which achieve bit-optimality in the compressed output size by taking efficient/optimal time and optimal space. These theoretical results will be sustained by some experiments that will compare our novel LZ-based compressors against the most popular compression tools (like gzip, bzip2) and state-of-the-art compressors (like the booster of [14, 13]).
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
|
 |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
R. Cilibrasi and P. M. B. Vitányi. Clustering by compression. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 51(4):1523--1545, 2005.
|
| |
6
|
|
| |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
G. Della Penna, F. Mignosi, A. Langiu, and A. Ulisse. On dictionary-symbolwise data compression. Personal Communication, 2008.
|
| |
11
|
P. Elias. Universal codeword sets and representations of the integers. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 21(2):194--203, 1975.
|
| |
12
|
P. Fenwick. Universal codes. In Lossless Compression Handbook, pages 55--78. Academic Press, 2003.
|
| |
13
|
|
 |
14
|
|
| |
15
|
P. Ferragina and G. Navarro. Site pizza&chili (http://pizzachili.di.unipi.it or http://pizzachili.dcc.uchile.cl).
|
 |
16
|
|
| |
17
|
T. Gagie and G. Manzini. Space-conscious compression. In Procs MFCS, LNCS 4708, Springer, pages 206--217, 2007.
|
 |
18
|
|
| |
19
|
Gzip home page. http://www.gzip.org.
|
| |
20
|
|
 |
21
|
|
| |
22
|
S. T. Klein. Efficient optimal recompression. Computer Journal, 40(2/3):117--126, 1997.
|
| |
23
|
|
| |
24
|
M. Lewenstein, V., Mäkinen, and S. J. Puglisi. Personal communications.
|
| |
25
|
|
| |
26
|
E. M. McCreight. Priority search trees. SIAM Journal on Computing, 14(2):257--276, 1985.
|
 |
27
|
|
| |
28
|
N. Rajpoot and C. Sahinalp. Handbook of Lossless Data Compression, chapter Dictionary-based data compression, pages 153--167. Academic Press, 2002.
|
| |
29
|
|
| |
30
|
E. J. Schuegraf and H. S. Heaps. A comparison of algorithms for data base compression by use of fragments as language elements. Information Storage and Retrieval, 10(9--10):309319, 1974.
|
 |
31
|
|
| |
32
|
W. Szpankowski. Asymptotic properties of data compression and suffix trees. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 39(5):1647--1659, 1993.
|
 |
33
|
|
| |
34
|
|
| |
35
|
|
| |
36
|
J. Ziv. Classification with finite memory revisited. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 53(12):4413--4421, 2007.
|
| |
37
|
J. Ziv and A. Lempel. A universal algorithm for sequential data compression. IEEE Transaction on Information Theory, 23:337--343, 1977.
|
| |
38
|
J. Ziv and A. Lempel. Compression of individual sequences via variable-rate coding. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 24(5):530--536, 1978.
|
|