ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Line transversals of convex polyhedra in R3
Full text PdfPdf (486 KB)
Source Symposium on Discrete Algorithms archive
Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual ACM -SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms table of contents
New York, New York
Pages 170-179  
Year of Publication: 2009
Authors
Haim Kaplan  Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
Natan Rubin  Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
Micha Sharir  Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel and New York University, New York, NY
Publisher
Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics  Philadelphia, PA, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 34,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

We establish a bound of O(n2k1+ε), for any ε > 0, on the combinatorial complexity of the set T of line transversals of a collection P of k convex polyhedra in R3 with a total of n facets, and present a randomized algorithm which computes the boundary of T in comparable expected time. Thus, when kn, the new bounds on the complexity (and construction cost) of T improve upon the previously best known bounds, which are nearly cubic in n.

To obtain the above result, we study the set Tl0 of line transversals which emanate from a fixed line l0, establish an almost tight bound of O(nk1+ε) on the complexity of Tl0, and provide a randomized algorithm which computes Tl0 in comparable expected time. Slightly improved combinatorial bounds for the complexity of Tl0, and comparable improvements in the cost of constructing this set, are established for two special cases, both assuming that the polyhedra of P are pairwise disjoint: the case where l0 is disjoint from the polyhedra of P, and the case where the polyhedra of P are unbounded in a direction parallel to l0.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
P. K. Agarwal, B. Aronov and M. Sharir, Line transversals of balls and smallest enclosing cylinders in three dimensions, Discrete Comput. Geom. 21(3) (1999), 373--388.
 
3
P. K. Agarwal, O. Schwarzkopf and M. Sharir, The overlay of lower envelopes in 3-space and its applications, Discrete Comput. Geom. 15 (1996), 1--13.
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
B. Chazelle, H. Edelsbrunner, L. Guibas, M. Sharir and J. Stolfi, Lines in space: Combinatorics and algorithms, Algorithmica 15 (1996), 428--447.
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
J. E. Goodman, R. Pollack and R. Wenger, Geometric transversal theory, in New Trends in Discrete and Computational Geometry, J. Pach (Ed.), Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1993, pp. 163--198.
 
16
D. Halperin and M. Sharir, New bounds for lower envelopes in three dimensions, with applications to visbility in terrains, Discrete Comput. Geom. 12 (1994), 313--326.
 
17
H. Kaplan, N. Rubin and M. Sharir, Linear data structures for fast ray shooting amidst convex polyhedra, Algorithmica, to appear. Also in Proc. 15th Europ. Sympos. Algo., 2007, 287--298.
 
18
H. Kaplan, N. Rubin and M. Sharir, Line transversals of convex polyhedra in R3, http://www.cs.tau.ac.il/~rubinnat/TransPoly.pdf. Also see arXiv:0807.1221.
 
19
M. Katchalski, T. Lewis and J. Zaks, Geometric permutations for convex sets, Discrete Math. 54 (1985), 271--284.
 
20
 
21
M. J. Katz and K. R. Varadarajan, A tight bound on the number of geometric permutations of convex fat objects in Rd, Discrete Comput. Geom. 26(4) (2001), 543--548.
 
22
V. Koltun and M. Sharir, The partition technique for overlays of envelopes, SIAM J. Comput. 32(4) (2003), 841--863.
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
S. Smorodinsky, J. S. B. Mitchell and M. Sharir, Sharp bounds on geometric permutations of pairwise disjoint balls in Rd, Discrete Comput. Geom. 23(2) (2000), 247--259.
 
29
D. Sommerville, Analytical Geometry in Three Dimensions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1951.
 
30
 
31

Collaborative Colleagues:
Haim Kaplan: colleagues
Natan Rubin: colleagues
Micha Sharir: colleagues