ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Improved bounds and new techniques for Davenport--Schinzel sequences and their generalizations
Full text PdfPdf (534 KB)
Source Symposium on Discrete Algorithms archive
Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual ACM -SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms table of contents
New York, New York
Pages 1-10  
Year of Publication: 2009
Author
Gabriel Nivasch  Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
Publisher
Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics  Philadelphia, PA, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 13,   Downloads (12 Months): 107,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

We present several new results regarding λs(n), the maximum length of a Davenport--Schinzel sequence of order s on n distinct symbols.

First, we prove that

[EQUATION]

where t = [(s - 2)/2], and α(n) denotes the inverse Ackermann function. The previous upper bounds, by Agarwal, Sharir, and Shor (1989), had a leading coefficient of 1 instead of 1/t! in the exponent. The bounds for even s are now tight up to lower-order terms in the exponent. These new bounds result from a small improvement on the technique of Agarwal et al.

More importantly, we also present a new technique for deriving upper bounds for λs(n). This new technique is based on some recurrences very similar to those used by the author, together with Alon, Kaplan, Sharir, and Smorodinsky (SODA 2008), for the problem of stabbing interval chains with j-tuples. With this new technique we: (1) re-derive the upper bound of λ3(n) ≤ 2nα(n)+O(n)√α(n) (first shown by Klazar, 1999); (2) re-derive our own new upper bounds for general s; and (3) obtain improved upper bounds for the generalized Davenport--Schinzel sequences considered by Adamec, Klazar, and Valtr (1992).

Regarding lower bounds, we show that λ3(n) ≥ 2nα(n) - O (n) (the previous lower bound (Sharir and Agarwal, 1995) had a coefficient of 1/2), so the coefficient 2 is tight. We also present a simpler variant of the construction of Agarwal, Sharir, and Shor that achieves the known lower bounds of λs(n) ≥ n·2(1/t!)α(n)t - O (α(n)t-1) for s ≥ 4 even.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
4
 
5
H. Davenport and A. Schinzel, A combinatorial problem connected with differential equations, American J. Math., 87:684--694, 1965.
 
6
 
7
M. Klazar, A general upper bound in extremal theory of sequences, Comment. Math. Univ. Carol., 33:737--746, 1992.
 
8
M. Klazar, On the maximum lengths of Davenport--Schinzel sequences, in R. Graham et al., editors, Contemporary Trends in Discrete Mathematics (DIMACS Series in Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science, Vol. 49), pp. 169--178, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1999.
 
9
M. Klazar, Generalized Davenport--Schinzel sequences: Results, problems, and applications, Integers, 2:A11, 39 pp. (electronic), 2002.
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
R. Seidel, Understanding the inverse Ackermann function, PDF presentation. Available at http://cgi.di.uoa.gr/~ewcg06/invited/Seidel.pdf.
 
14
 
15
R. Sundar, On the deque conjecture for the splay algorithm, Combinatorica, 12:95--124, 1992.
 
16
P. Valtr, Generalizations of Davenport--Schinzel sequences, in R. Graham et al., editors, Contemporary Trends in Discrete Mathematics (DIMACS Series in Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science, Vol. 49), pp. 349--389, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1999.
 
17