ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Skype video responsiveness to bandwidth variations
Full text PdfPdf (1.79 MB)
Source
International Workshop on Network and Operating System Support for Digital Audio and Video archive
Proceedings of the 18th International Workshop on Network and Operating Systems Support for Digital Audio and Video table of contents
Braunschweig, Germany
SESSION: Analyses and conclusions table of contents
Pages 81-86  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-157-6
Authors
Luca De Cicco  Politecnico di Bari, Bari, Italy
Saverio Mascolo  Politecnico di Bari, Bari, Italy
Vittorio Palmisano  Politecnico di Bari, Bari, Italy
Sponsors
: Technische Universität Braunschweig
SIGMULTIMEDIA: ACM Special Interest Group on Multimedia
: Simula Research Laboratory
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 17,   Downloads (12 Months): 144,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1496046.1496065
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The TCP/IP stack has been extremely successful for reliable delivery of best-effort, time insensitive elastic type data traffic. Nowadays, the Internet is rapidly evolving to become an equally efficient platform for multimedia content delivery. Key examples of this evolution are, to name few, YouTube, Skype Audio/Video, IPTV, P2P video distribution such as Coolstreaming or Joost. While YouTube streams videos using the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP), applications that are time-sensitive such as Skype VoIP or Video Conferencing employ the UDP because they can tolerate small loss percentages but not delays due to TCP recovery of losses via retransmissions. Since the UDP does not implement congestion control, these applications must implement those functionalities at the application layer in order to avoid congestion and preserve network stability. In this paper we investigate Skype Video in order to discover to what extent this application is able to throttle its sending rate to match the unpredictable Internet bandwidth while preserving resource for co-existing best-effort TCP traffic.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
R. Barbosa, C. Kamienski, D. Mariz, A. Callado, S. Fernandes, and D. Sadok. Performance evaluation of P2P VoIP application. ACM NOSSDAV '07, June 2007.
 
2
S. Baset and H. Schulzrinne. An Analysis of the Skype Peer-to-Peer Internet Telephony Protocol. IEEE INFOCOM '06, Apr. 2006.
 
3
J.-C. Bolot and T. Turletti. A rate control mechanism for packet video in the internet. In IEEE INFOCOM '94, pages 1216 1223, June 1994.
4
5
 
6
W. Chiang, W. Xiao, and C. Chou. A Performance Study of VoIP Applications: MSN vs. Skype. MULTICOMM '06, June 2006.
 
7
 
8
 
9
S. Floyd and E. Kohler. TCP Friendly Rate Control (TFRC): The small-packet (sp) variant. RFC 4828, Experimental, Apr. 2007.
 
10
L. A. Grieco and S. Mascolo. Adaptive rate control for streaming flows over the internet. ACM Multimedia Systems Journal, 9(6):517 532, June 2004.
 
11
S. Guha, N. Daswani, and R. Jain. An Experimental Study of the Skype Peer-to-Peer VoIP System. Proc. IPTPS '06, Feb. 2006.
 
12
 
13
T. Hoßfeld and A. Binzenhöfer. Analysis of Skype VoIP traffic in UMTS: End-to-end QoS and QoE measurements. Computer Networks, 2007.
14
 
15
On2 Technologies. TrueMotion VP7 Video Codec White Paper. 10 Jan. 2005.
 
16
17
 
18
S. Wenger. H. 264/AVC over IP. IEEE Trans. Circuits and Syst. Video Technol., 13(7):645 656, 2003.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Luca De Cicco: colleagues
Saverio Mascolo: colleagues
Vittorio Palmisano: colleagues