| Skype video responsiveness to bandwidth variations |
| Full text |
Pdf
(1.79 MB)
|
Source
|
International Workshop on Network and Operating System Support for Digital Audio and Video
archive
Proceedings of the 18th International Workshop on Network and Operating Systems Support for Digital Audio and Video
table of contents
Braunschweig, Germany
SESSION: Analyses and conclusions
table of contents
Pages 81-86
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-157-6
|
|
Authors
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 17, Downloads (12 Months): 144, Citation Count: 2
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
The TCP/IP stack has been extremely successful for reliable delivery of best-effort, time insensitive elastic type data traffic. Nowadays, the Internet is rapidly evolving to become an equally efficient platform for multimedia content delivery. Key examples of this evolution are, to name few, YouTube, Skype Audio/Video, IPTV, P2P video distribution such as Coolstreaming or Joost. While YouTube streams videos using the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP), applications that are time-sensitive such as Skype VoIP or Video Conferencing employ the UDP because they can tolerate small loss percentages but not delays due to TCP recovery of losses via retransmissions. Since the UDP does not implement congestion control, these applications must implement those functionalities at the application layer in order to avoid congestion and preserve network stability. In this paper we investigate Skype Video in order to discover to what extent this application is able to throttle its sending rate to match the unpredictable Internet bandwidth while preserving resource for co-existing best-effort TCP traffic.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
R. Barbosa, C. Kamienski, D. Mariz, A. Callado, S. Fernandes, and D. Sadok. Performance evaluation of P2P VoIP application. ACM NOSSDAV '07, June 2007.
|
| |
2
|
S. Baset and H. Schulzrinne. An Analysis of the Skype Peer-to-Peer Internet Telephony Protocol. IEEE INFOCOM '06, Apr. 2006.
|
| |
3
|
J.-C. Bolot and T. Turletti. A rate control mechanism for packet video in the internet. In IEEE INFOCOM '94, pages 1216 1223, June 1994.
|
 |
4
|
Dario Bonfiglio , Marco Mellia , Michela Meo , Dario Rossi , Paolo Tofanelli, Revealing skype traffic: when randomness plays with you, Proceedings of the 2007 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications, August 27-31, 2007, Kyoto, Japan
|
 |
5
|
Kuan-Ta Chen , Chun-Ying Huang , Polly Huang , Chin-Laung Lei, Quantifying Skype user satisfaction, Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications, September 11-15, 2006, Pisa, Italy
|
| |
6
|
W. Chiang, W. Xiao, and C. Chou. A Performance Study of VoIP Applications: MSN vs. Skype. MULTICOMM '06, June 2006.
|
| |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
S. Floyd and E. Kohler. TCP Friendly Rate Control (TFRC): The small-packet (sp) variant. RFC 4828, Experimental, Apr. 2007.
|
| |
10
|
L. A. Grieco and S. Mascolo. Adaptive rate control for streaming flows over the internet. ACM Multimedia Systems Journal, 9(6):517 532, June 2004.
|
| |
11
|
S. Guha, N. Daswani, and R. Jain. An Experimental Study of the Skype Peer-to-Peer VoIP System. Proc. IPTPS '06, Feb. 2006.
|
| |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
T. Hoßfeld and A. Binzenhöfer. Analysis of Skype VoIP traffic in UMTS: End-to-end QoS and QoE measurements. Computer Networks, 2007.
|
 |
14
|
Eddie Kohler , Mark Handley , Sally Floyd, Designing DCCP: congestion control without reliability, Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications, September 11-15, 2006, Pisa, Italy
|
| |
15
|
On2 Technologies. TrueMotion VP7 Video Codec White Paper. 10 Jan. 2005.
|
| |
16
|
|
 |
17
|
|
| |
18
|
S. Wenger. H. 264/AVC over IP. IEEE Trans. Circuits and Syst. Video Technol., 13(7):645 656, 2003.
|
|