ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A numerical evaluation of preprocessing and ILU-type preconditioners for the solution of unsymmetric sparse linear systems using iterative methods
Full text PdfPdf (408 KB)
Source
ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software (TOMS) archive
Volume 36 ,  Issue 1  (March 2009) table of contents
Article No. 1  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISSN:0098-3500
Author
Jan Mayer  Universiät Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 10,   Downloads (12 Months): 120,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1486525.1486526
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Recent advances in multilevel LU factorizations and novel preprocessing techniques have led to an extremely large number of possibilities for preconditioning sparse, unsymmetric linear systems for solving with iterative methods. However, not all combinations work well for all systems, so making the right choices is essential for obtaining an efficient solver. The numerical results for 256 matrices presented in this article give an indication of which approaches are suitable for which matrices (based on different criteria, such as total computation time or fill-in) and of the differences between the methods.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Bollhöfer, M. 2001. A robust ILU with pivoting based on monitoring the growth of inverse factors. Lin. Alg. Appl. 338, 201--218.
 
3
 
4
Bollhöfer, M. and Saad, Y. 2003. Multilevel preconditioners constructed from inverse-based ILUs. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 25, 2, 715--728.
 
5
Bollhöfer, M. and Saad, Y. 2008. ILUPACK. http://www.math.tu-berlin.de/ilupack/.
 
6
 
7
 
8
Davis, T. 2008. University of Florida Sparse Matrix Collection. http://www.cise.ufl.edu/research/sparse/matrices.
 
9
Dolan, E. and Moré, J. J. 2002. Benchmarking optimization software with performance profiles. Math. Program. 91, 2, 201--213.
 
10
 
11
 
12
13
 
14
 
15
Karypis, G. 2008. METIS. http://glaros.dtc.umn.edu/gkhome/views/metis/.
 
16
 
17
Mayer, J. 2005. ILUCP: A Crout ILU preconditioner with pivoting. Numer. Linear Algebra Appl. 12, 9, 941--955.
 
18
 
19
Mayer, J. 2007. A multilevel Crout ILU preconditioner with pivoting and row permutation. Numer. Linear Algebra Appl. 14, 10, 771--789.
 
20
Mayer, J. 2008a. ILU++. http://www.iluplusplus.de.
 
21
 
22
Olschowska, M. and Neumaier, A. 1996. A new pivoting strategy for Gaussian elimination. Lin. Alg. Appl. 220, 131--151.
 
23
Saad, Y. 1994. ILUT: A dual threshold incomplete LU factorization. Numer. Linear Algebra Appl. 1, 387--402.
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
Schenk, O. and Gärtner, K. 2006. On fast factorization pivoting methods for sparse symmetric indefinite systems. Elec. Trans. Numer. Anal. 23, 158--179.
 
28
Schenk, O. and Gärtner, K. 2008. PARDISO. http://www.pardiso-project.org.
 
29
Schenk, O., Gärtner, K., and Fichtner, W. 2000. Efficient sparse LU factorization with left-looking strategy on shared memory multiprocessors. BIT 40, 1, 158--176.
 
30
Tismenetsky, M. 1991. A new preconditioning technique for solving large sparse linear systems. Linear Algebra Appl. 154-156, 331--353.