ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Digital Library logoTake a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.
Addressing the disconnect between the good and the popular
Full text PdfPdf (38 KB)
Source
ACM SIGPLAN Notices archive
Volume 43 ,  Issue 11  (November 2008) table of contents
COLUMN: White papers table of contents
Pages: 74-76  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISSN:0362-1340
Author
Michael Hind  IBM T.J. Watson Research Center
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 5,   Downloads (12 Months): 45,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1480828.1480844
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

For several decades universities have taught programming languages as a fundamental part of their un-dergraduate curriculum. These courses cover the core topics used in the design of good programming languages. However, widely used commercial languages quite often seem to go against the conventional wisdom of good language design that is taught in these courses. This disconnect between what is taught as good language design and what languages are used in industry has put the programming language course in a bind. Specifically, as computer science departments feel the increased pressure to add new emerging topics, many departments are choosing to remove the programming language course from the core curriculum. In this position paper, we argue that the disconnect between good language design and industry practice is exactly why a programming language course should be a crucial ingredient in any undergraduate computer science education.