| Crowdsourcing for relevance evaluation |
| Full text |
Pdf
(428 KB)
|
Source
|
ACM SIGIR Forum
archive
Volume 42 , Issue 2 (December 2008)
table of contents
Pages 9-15
Year of Publication: 2008
ISSN:0163-5840
|
|
Authors
|
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 47, Downloads (12 Months): 300, Citation Count: 3
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
Relevance evaluation is an essential part of the development and maintenance of information retrieval systems. Yet traditional evaluation approaches have several limitations; in particular, conducting new editorial evaluations of a search system can be very expensive. We describe a new approach to evaluation called TERC, based on the crowdsourcing paradigm, in which many online users, drawn from a large community, each performs a small evaluation task.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
Amazon Mechanical Turk, http://www.mturk.com
|
 |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
Brendan O'Connor, "Search Engine Relevance: An Empirical Test", http://blog.doloreslabs.com/2008/04/search-engine-relevance-an-empirical-test/#more-35, accessed April 13, 2008.
|
| |
4
|
Jeff Howe. "The Rise of Crowdsourcing". Wired, June 2006. http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/14.06/crowds.html
|
| |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
|
| |
7
|
Daniel E. Rose, "Why Is Web Search So Hard... to Evaluate?" Journal of Web Engineering, Vol. 3, Nos. 3 & 4, pp. 171--181, December 2004.
|
| |
8
|
|
 |
9
|
|
|