ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
On the pragmatics of network communication
Full text PdfPdf (775 KB)
Source
ICPW; Vol. 363 archive
Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on the Pragmatic Web: Innovating the Interactive Society table of contents
Uppsala, Sweden
Pages 49-57  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-354-9
Authors
Hans Weigand  Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
Mikael Lind  University College of Borås, Borås, Sweden
Sponsor
SIGWEB: ACM Special Interest Group on Hypertext, Hypermedia, and Web
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 85,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1479190.1479198
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Because of globalization and the rise of Internet, the competitive environment of firms is undergoing a fundamental change. Firms are increasingly forced to collaborate in networks. At the same time, social networks are growing tremendously in use and in functionality. In this paper, the current network era is perceived from a communication perspective. How do people communicate in a network? How could the communication be improved? For the analysis we draw on the Language Action Perspective (LAP). Central to this analysis is the question what people try to achieve by communication in social terms. At its inception, LAP was used in an intra-organizational context. The question is whether the same analysis and the same models are also applicable in a network context.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Ahrne G. (1994) Social Organizations. Interaction Inside, Outside and Between Organization, Sage, London
 
2
Albinsson L., Lind M., Forsgren O., Ozan H. (2006) Turning the internet around - e-Me: The Students ideal e-Service, eChallenges e-2006, 25--27 October 2006, Barcelona, Spain
 
3
Albinsson L., Lind M., Forsgren O. (2007) "Co-Design: An approach to border crossing, Network Innovation" in Cunningham, P and Cunningham, M (Eds), Expanding the Knowledge Economy: Issues, Applications, Case Studies, Volume 4, Part 2, Amsterdam, IOS Press, pp. 977--983
 
4
Austin J. L. (1962) How to Do Things with Words, Oxford University Press
 
5
Barratt M. Understanding the meaning of collaboration in the supply chain, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Vol. 9 (1), 2004, pp. 30--42
 
6
Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1)
 
7
Churchman, C. W. (1968). The Systems Approach. New York: Dell Publishing.
 
8
Churchman, C. W. (1979). The systems approach and its enemies. New York, Basic Books
 
9
Flores, Fernando, and Juan J. Ludlow. 1980. Doing and speaking in the office. Decision Support Systems: Issues and Challenges, Proceedings of an International Task Force Meeting, June 23--25, 1980.
 
10
Goldkuhl G., Lind M. (2004) "Developing e-interactions -- a framework for business capabilities and exchanges", accepted to the 12th European Conference on Information Systems, June 14--16 2004, Turkku, Finland
 
11
Granovetter, M. (1973). "The Strength of Weak Ties", American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 78, Issue 6, May 1360--80
 
12
Gummesson, E, Relationship Marketing and imaginary organizations: a synthesis. European Journal of Marketing, 30 (2), 1996, pp. 31--44
 
13
Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action, I. Beacon Press.
 
14
Haeckel, Stephan. Adaptive Enterprise: Creating and leading sense-and-respond organizations. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1999.
 
15
Håkansson, H., Ford. D., How should companies interact in business networks? Journal of Business Research 55 (2002), pp.133--139.
 
16
Haraldson S. (2008) Designprinciper för handlingskvalitet i samverkan - ett multiorganisatoriskt perspektiv på tredjepartslogistik, Licentiate thesis, Linköping University
 
17
Haraldson S., Lind M. (2005) "Broken Patterns" in Goldkuhl G., Lind M., Haraldson S. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 10th International Working Conference on The Language Action Perspective on Communication Modelling, Linköping University and University College of Borås, Sweden
 
18
Haraldson S., Lind M. (2006) "Contextual Understanding of Dyadic Relationships", 4th Intl Conf on Action in Language, Organisations and Information Systems (ALOIS), University College of Borås, Sweden
 
19
Hedberg, B, Dahlgren, C., Hansson J, Olve N.-G. Imaginary Organizations. Liber-Hermods, Malmo, 1994 (in Swedish)
 
20
Holling, C. S., Understanding the Complexity of Economic, Ecological and Social Systems. Ecosystems 4 (2001):390--405.
 
21
Johnston, W., Peters L, Gassenheimer J. Questions about netowork dynamics: characteristics, structures and interactions. Journal of Business Research 59 (2006), pp.945--954.
 
22
Lind M., Forsgren O. (2008) Co-design: The theoretical foundation of Web 2.0, submitted paper
 
23
 
24
Luke Roice D., Bergun James, Pointer Dennis. Quasi firms: strategic interorganizational forms in the health care industry. Academy of Management Review 1989 14(1), pp.9--19.
 
25
Malinowski, B.. "The problem of meaning in primitive languages." In The Meaning of Meaning. A Study of the Influence of Language upon Thought and of the Science of Symbolism, edited by Charles Ogden and Ivor Richards, 296--336. London: Kegan Paul. (Fourth edition revised 1936), 1923.
 
26
Möller, Kristian K., Halinen, Aino, Business Relationships and Networks:: Managerial Challenge of Network Era, Industrial Marketing Management, Volume 28, Issue 5,, September 1999, Pages 413--427.
 
27
O'Reilly, T. What is web 2.0: Designing patterns and business models for the next generation of software, Communications & Strategies, no 65, 2007, pp. 17
 
28
Reijswoud, V. E., (1996). The structure of business communication. Ph.D. Thesis, Delft University of Technology.
 
29
Searle, 1969. Speech Acts. Cambridge Univ Press.
 
30
Searle (1989). How Performatives Work. Linguistics & Philosophy 12, pp.535--558.
 
31
Sbisa, M. Speech Acts in Context. Language & Communication 22 (2002), pp.421--436.
 
32
Spinosa, Ch, Flores, F, Dreyfus, H. Disclosing New Worlds. MIT Press, 2001.
 
33
Taylor J. R. (1993) Rethinking the Theory of Organizational Communication: How to Read an Organisation, Ablex, Norwood.
 
34
Taylor J. R. (1998). The limits of rationality in communication modelling -- a socio-semiotic reinterpretation of the concept of "speech act". In Proc. 3rd Int. Workshop on Communication Modelling, the Language/Action Perspective (LAP'98), Steningevik, Sweden, June 25--26
 
35
 
36
 
37

Collaborative Colleagues:
Hans Weigand: colleagues
Mikael Lind: colleagues