ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
An annotation model for making sense of information quality in online video
Full text PdfPdf (1.33 MB)
Source
ICPW; Vol. 363 archive
Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on the Pragmatic Web: Innovating the Interactive Society table of contents
Uppsala, Sweden
Pages 31-34  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-354-9
Authors
Nicholas Diakopoulos  Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Interactive Computing, GVU Center, Atlanta, GA
Irfan Essa  Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Interactive Computing, GVU Center, Atlanta, GA
Sponsor
SIGWEB: ACM Special Interest Group on Hypertext, Hypermedia, and Web
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 9,   Downloads (12 Months): 65,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1479190.1479195
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Making sense of the information quality of online media including things such as the accuracy and validity of claims and the reliability of sources is essential for people to be well-informed. We are developing Videolyzer to address the challenge of information quality sense-making by allowing motivated individuals to analyze, collect, share, and respond to criticisms of the information quality of online political videos and their transcripts. In this paper specifically we present a model of how the annotation ontology and collaborative dynamics embedded in Videolyzer can enhance information quality.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Buckingham Shum, S., Sensemaking on the Pragmatic Web: A Hypermedia Discourse Perspective. in Proceedings of the International Conference on the Pragmatic Web, (2006).
2
 
3
4
 
5
Evans, J. Bias in Human Reasoning: Causes and Consequences. Lawrence, 1989.
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
Goldstein, T. Journalism and Truth: Strange Bedfellows. Northwestern University Press, 2007.
10
 
11
Kim, P., Eng, T., Deering, M. J. and Maxfield, A. Published criteria for evaluating health related web sites: review. BMJ, 318 (March). 647--649.
 
12
Kovach, B. and Rosenstiel, T. The Elements of Journalism: What Newspeople Should Know and the Public Should Expect. Three Rivers Press, 2007.
 
13
Lawrence, G. and Grey, D. Subjective Inaccuracies in Local News Reporting. Journalism Quarterly, 46. 753--757.
 
14
Meyer, P. Defining and Measuring Credibility of Newspapers: Developing an Index. Journalism Quarterly, 65. 567--574.
 
15
16
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
21
 
22
Yin, R. Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Applied Social Research Methods). SAGE Publications, 2002.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Nicholas Diakopoulos: colleagues
Irfan Essa: colleagues