ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Digital Library logoTake a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.
About Vi-Fi ("Visible - Findable") - how to describe and to search sites with standard and universal semantic-pragmatic tree: semantic web as pragmatic web
Full text PdfPdf (587 KB)
Source
ICPW; Vol. 363 archive
Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on the Pragmatic Web: Innovating the Interactive Society table of contents
Uppsala, Sweden
Pages: 23-30  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-354-9
Author
Sponsor
SIGWEB: ACM Special Interest Group on Hypertext, Hypermedia, and Web
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 34,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1479190.1479194
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The new approach to Web search, which provides powerful narrow-focused marketing tool for small on-line businesses as well as for everybody, who want to increase his visibility in Web, is proposed. The core of approach is observable (small enough - of the order of tens) standard universal system of both attributes and their values, which describes requests of WEB-users and content (offers) of sites in the same language and allow to calculate easily congruency between query and site. This system is based on pragmatics (logic of customer's request) rather than on usual ("pure") ontology and is organized as tree. Both web-masters and searchers browse this tree to describe their sites and queries respectively. The tree changes until take its ultimate form as approach is realized.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., and Lassila, O. 2001 The Semantic Web, Scientific American (May 2001), 35--43.
 
2
Joseph, J. E., Love, N., and Taylor T. J. 2001. Landmarks in Linguistic Thought II: The Western Tradition in the Twentieth Century. Routledge, London.
 
3
Hamlet, Prince of Denmark. Act III, scene I, P. Edwards Ed., updated edition 2003 (New Cambridge Shakespeare).
 
4
Harley, T., A. 2007 The Psychology of Language. From Data to Theory. Psychology Press.
 
5
 
6
Higher Level Language Processes in the Brain. Inference and Comprehension Processes 2007 Schmalhofer, F. and. Perfetti, C. A. Eds. Psychology Press.
 
7
Hildebrand, M., van Ossenbruggen, J., and Hardman L 2007. An Analysis of Search-based User Interaction on the Semantic Web. Hildebrand, REPORT INS-E0706 MAY 2007. Centrum voor Wiskundeen Informatica Information Systems.
 
8
Hirschman, L., Palmer, M., Dowding, J., Dahl, D., Linebarger, M., Passonneau, R., Land, F.-M., Ball, C., and Weir, C. 1989. The PUNDIT natural-language processing system. In Proceedings of the Annual of AI Systems in Government Conference (March 27--31, 1989). 234--243.
 
9
Lycan, W. 1995. Philosophy of Language In The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, R. Audi Ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 586--589.
 
10
Markman, A. B. 1998 Knowledge Representation. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 2005 Pragmatics. In Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Philosophy, F. Jackson and M. Smith Eds. OUP, Oxford, 468--501.