ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Open access publishing in science
Full text HtmlHtml (29 KB),  PdfPdf (239 KB)
Source
Communications of the ACM archive
Volume 52 ,  Issue 3  (March 2009) table of contents
Being Human in the Digital Age
SECTION: Virtual extension table of contents
Pages 135-139  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISSN:0001-0782
Authors
Florian Mann  Institute for Information Systems and New Media at the Munich School of Management, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
Benedikt von Walter  MTV Networks Germany GmbH, Berlin, Germany
Thomas Hess  Institute for Information Systems and New Media at the Munich School of Management, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
Rolf T. Wigand  Information Science and Management at the University of Arkansas at Little Rock, Little Rock, AR
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 28,   Downloads (12 Months): 476,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1467247.1467279
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

While the evolving information society is freely opening and sharing its diaries, social networks and source codes, it remains to be seen if the same will come true for scientific knowledge. Despite strong sympathy for the idea, scientists balk at Open Access publishing. Here we shed some light on why this is so.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50, (1991), 179--211.
 
2
Björk, B.C., Turk, Z., Holmström J. Benchmarking scientific journals from the submitting author's viewpoint. Learned Publishing 19, 2 (2006), 147--155.
 
3
Budapest Open Access Initiative; www.soros.org/openaccess.
 
4
European Commission. Study on the economic and technical evolution of the scientific publication markets in Europe, 2006. http://ec.europa.eu/research/sciencesociety/pdf/scientific-publication-study_en.pdf.
 
5
Harnad, S., Brody, T., Vallières, F., Carr, F., Hitchcock, S., Gingras, Y., Oppenheim, C., Stamerjohanns, H., Hilf, E. R. The access/impact problem and the green and gold roads to open access. Serials Review 30, 4 (2004), 310--314, http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/10209/01/impact.html.
 
6
Latour, B. Science in Action, How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1987.
 
7
Machlup, F. The Production and Distribution of Knowledge in the United States. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1962.
 
8
Rogers, E. Diffusion of Innovations. Fifth Edition, Free Press, New York, NY, 2003.
 
9
 
10
Swan, A. P., Brown S. N. JISC/OSI---Journal Authors Survey---Report, Key Perspectives, Truro, 2004; www.jisc.ac.uk/uploaded_documents/JISCOAreport1.pdf.
 
11
Tichenor, P. J., Donohue, G. A., Olien, C. N. Mass media flow and differential growth in knowledge. Public Opinion Quarterly 34, 2 (Summer 1976), 159--170.
 
12
Venkatesh, V., Morris, G, Davis, G. D. and Davis, F. D. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly 27, 3 (Sept. 2003), 425--478.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Florian Mann: colleagues
Benedikt von Walter: colleagues
Thomas Hess: colleagues
Rolf T. Wigand: colleagues