ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
On the lifetime of wireless sensor networks
Full text PdfPdf (673 KB)
Source
ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks (TOSN) archive
Volume 5 ,  Issue 1  (February 2009) table of contents
Article No. 5  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISSN:1550-4859
Authors
Isabel Dietrich  University of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
Falko Dressler  University of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 263,   Downloads (12 Months): 1435,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1464420.1464425
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Network lifetime has become the key characteristic for evaluating sensor networks in an application-specific way. Especially the availability of nodes, the sensor coverage, and the connectivity have been included in discussions on network lifetime. Even quality of service measures can be reduced to lifetime considerations. A great number of algorithms and methods were proposed to increase the lifetime of a sensor network—while their evaluations were always based on a particular definition of network lifetime. Motivated by the great differences in existing definitions of sensor network lifetime that are used in relevant publications, we reviewed the state of the art in lifetime definitions, their differences, advantages, and limitations. This survey was the starting point for our work towards a generic definition of sensor network lifetime for use in analytic evaluations as well as in simulation models—focusing on a formal and concise definition of accumulated network lifetime and total network lifetime. Our definition incorporates the components of existing lifetime definitions, and introduces some additional measures. One new concept is the ability to express the service disruption tolerance of a network. Another new concept is the notion of time-integration: in many cases, it is sufficient if a requirement is fulfilled over a certain period of time, instead of at every point in time. In addition, we combine coverage and connectivity to form a single requirement called connected coverage. We show that connected coverage is different from requiring noncombined coverage and connectivity. Finally, our definition also supports the concept of graceful degradation by providing means of estimating the degree of compliance with the application requirements. We demonstrate the applicability of our definition based on the surveyed lifetime definitions as well as using some example scenarios to explain the various aspects influencing sensor network lifetime.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Akkaya, K. and Younis, M. 2005. A survey of routing protocols in wireless sensor networks. Elsevier Ad Hoc Netw. 3, 3, 325--349.
 
2
Akyildiz, I. F. and Kasimoglu, I. H. 2004. Wireless sensor and actor networks: Research challenges. Elsevier Ad Hoc Netw. 2, 351--367.
 
3
Akyildiz, I. F., Su, W., Sankarasubramaniam, Y., and Cayirci, E. 2002a. A survey on sensor networks. IEEE Comm. Mag. 40, 8, 102--116.
 
4
 
5
Arampatzis, T., Lygeros, J., and Manesis, S. 2005. A survey of applications of wireless sensors and wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 13th Mediterrean Conference on Control and Automation, 719--724.
6
 
7
Bandyopadhyay, S. and Coyle, E. J. 2003. An energy efficient hierarchical clustering algorithm for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 22nd IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (IEEE INFOCOM). Vol. 3, 1713--1723.
 
8
Batalin, M. A. and Sukhatme, G. S. 2002. Sensor coverage using mobile robots and stationary nodes. In Proceedings of SPIE. Vol. 4868, 269--276.
 
9
Batalin, M. A. and Sukhatme, G. S. 2003. Coverage, exploration and deployment by a mobile robot and communication network. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, 376--391.
 
10
Baydere, S., Safkan, Y., and Durmaz, O. 2005. Lifetime analysis of reliable wireless sensor networks. IEICE Trans. Comm. E88-B, 6, 2465--2472.
 
11
 
12
Bhardwaj, M. and Chandrakasan, A. 2002. Bounding the lifetime of sensor networks via optimal role assignments. In Proceedings of the 21st IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM). Vol. 3, 1587--1596.
 
13
Bhardwaj, M., Garnett, T., and Chandrakasan, A. P. 2001. Upper bounds on the lifetime of sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC). Vol. 3, 785--790.
14
15
16
 
17
Cardei, M., Thai, M. T., Li, Y., and Wu, W. 2005. Energy-efficient target coverage in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 24th IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM).
 
18
Cardei, M. and Wu, J. 2004. Coverage in wireless sensor networks. In Handbook of Sensor Networks, M. Ilyas, Ed. CRC Press, West Palm Beach, FL.
 
19
 
20
Chang, J.-H. and Tassiulas, L. 2000. Energy conserving routing in wireless ad-hoc networks. In Proceedings of the 19th IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM), 22--31.
 
21
 
22
Chen, D. and Varshney, P. K. 2004. QoS support in wireless sensor networks: A survey. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Wireless Networks (ICWN).
 
23
 
24
Chong, C.-Y. and Kumar, S. P. 2003. Sensor networks: Evolution, opportunities, and challenges. Proc. IEEE 91, 8, 1247--1256.
 
25
 
26
Dasgupta, K., Kalpakis, K., and Namjoshi, P. 2003. Improving the lifetime of sensor networks via intelligent selection of data aggregation trees. In Proceedings of the Communication Networks and Distributed Systems Modeling and Simulation Conference (CNDS).
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
Duarte-Melo, E. J. and Liu, M. 2002. Analysis of energy consumption and lifetime of heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (GLOBECOM).
32
 
33
Gandham, S. R., Dawande, M., Prakash, R., and Venkatesan, S. 2003. Energy efficient schemes for wireless sensor networks with multiple mobile base stations. In Proceedings of the IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (GLOBECOM), 377--381.
 
34
 
35
Hellman, K. and Colagrosso, M. 2006. Investigating a wireless sensor network optimal lifetime solution for linear topologies. J. Interconn. Netw. 7, 1, 91--99.
 
36
Huang, C.-F. and Tseng, Y.-C. 2005. A survey of solutions to the coverage problems in wireless sensor networks. J. Internet Tech. 6, 1, 1--8.
 
37
Iyer, R. and Kleinrock, L. 2003. QoS control for sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).
 
38
Jiang, Q. and Manivannan, D. 2004. Routing protocols for sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 1st IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (CCNC), 93--98.
 
39
Kansal, A., Ramamoorthy, A., Srivastava, M. B., and Pottie, G. J. 2005. On sensor network lifetime and data distortion. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT), 6--10.
 
40
Khan, M. and Misic, J. 2008. Security in IEEE 802.15.4 cluster based networks. In Security in Wireless Mesh Networks, Y. Zhang, J. Zheng, and H. Hu, Eds. Wireless Networks and Mobile Communications, vol. 6. Auerbach Publications, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
 
41
Khemapech, I., Duncan, I., and Miller, A. 2005. A survey of wireless sensor networks technology. In Proceedings of the 6th Annual PostGraduate Symposium on the Convergence of Telecommunications, Networking and Broadcasting, M. Merabti and R. Pereira, Eds.
 
42
Krishnamachari, B., Estrin, D., and Wicker, S. 2002. The impact of data aggregation in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Distributed Event Based Systems (DEBS).
 
43
Kumar, S., Arora, A., and Lai, T. H. 2005. On the lifetime analysis of always-on wireless sensor network applications. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Mobile Ad-Hoc and Sensor Systems (MASS).
 
44
 
45
46
 
47
Lee, J.-J., Krishnamachari, B., and Kuo, C.-C. J. 2004. Impact of heterogeneous deployment on lifetime sensing coverage in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks (SECON), 367--376.
 
48
49
 
50
Liu, H., Wan, P., Yi, C.-W., Jia, X., Makki, S., and Niki, P. 2005b. Maximal lifetime scheduling in sensor surveillance networks. In Proceedings of the 24th IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM). Vol. 4, 2482--2491.
 
51
Low, K. H., Leow, W. K., and Ang, M. H. 2005. Autonomic mobile sensor network with self-coordinated task allocation and execution. IEEE Trans. Sys. Man Cyb.--Part C: Appl. Rev. 36, 3, 315--327.
 
52
Madan, R., Cui, S., Lall, S., and Goldsmith, A. 2005. Cross-layer design for lifetime maximization in interference-limited wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 24th IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM). Vol. 3, 1964--1975.
 
53
Mhatre, V. and Rosenberg, C. 2004. Design guidelines for wireless sensor networks: communication, clustering and aggregation. Elsevier Ad Hoc Netw. 2, 1, 45--63.
 
54
 
55
Mo, W., Qiao, D., and Wang, Z. 2005. Mostly-sleeping wireless sensor networks: connectivity, k-coverage, and alpha-lifetime. In Proceedings of the the 43rd Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing.
 
56
 
57
Olariu, S. and Stojmenovic, I. 2006. Design guidelines for maximizing lifetime and avoiding energy holes in sensor networks with uniform distribution and uniform reporting. In Proceedings of the 25th IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM).
 
58
Sha, K. and Shi, W. 2005. Modeling the lifetime of wireless sensor networks. Sens. Lett. 3, 2, 126--135.
 
59
Shah, R. C. and Rabaey, J. M. 2002. Energy aware routing for low energy ad hoc sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC).
 
60
Solis, I. and Obraczka, K. 2004. The impact of timing in data aggregation for sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC). Vol. 6, 3640--3645.
 
61
 
62
63
64
65
66
 
67
Welsh, E., Fish, W., and Frantz, J. P. 2003. GNOMES: A testbed for low-power heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS).
 
68
 
69
70
 
71
Ye, F., Zhong, G., Lu, S., and Zhang, L. 2002. Energy efficient robust sensing coverage in large sensor networks. Tech. Rep., UCLA, CS 1RL.
 
72
 
73
Yu, Y., Govindan, R., and Estrin, D. 2001. Geographical and energy aware routing: A recursive data dissemination protocol for wireless sensor networks. Tech. Rep. UCLA/CSD-TR-01-0023, UCLA Computer Science Department.
 
74
Zhang, H. and Hou, J. C. 2005a. Maintaining sensing coverage and connectivity in large sensor networks. Wireless Ad Hoc Sens. Netw.: Int. J. 1, 1-2, 89--123.
 
75
Zhang, H. and Hou, J. C. 2005b. Maximizing α-lifetime for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Measurement, Modeling, and Performance Analysis of Wireless Sensor Networks (SenMetrics).
76
77
 
78
Zhou, Z., Das, S. R., and Gupta, H. 2005. Fault tolerant connected sensor cover with variable sensing and transmission ranges. In Proceedings of the Second Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks (SECON), 594--604.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Isabel Dietrich: colleagues
Falko Dressler: colleagues