ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Sensor node lifetime analysis: Models and tools
Full text PdfPdf (1.86 MB)
Source
ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks (TOSN) archive
Volume 5 ,  Issue 1  (February 2009) table of contents
Article No. 3  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISSN:1550-4859
Authors
Deokwoo Jung  Yale University, New Haven, CT
Thiago Teixeira  Yale University, New Haven, CT
Andreas Savvides  Yale University, New Haven, CT
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 50,   Downloads (12 Months): 413,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1464420.1464423
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This article presents two lifetime models that describe two of the most common modes of operation of sensor nodes today, trigger-driven and duty-cycle driven. The models use a set of hardware parameters such as power consumption per task, state transition overheads, and communication cost to compute a node's average lifetime for a given event arrival rate. Through comparison of the two models and a case study from a real camera sensor node design we show how the models can be applied to drive architectural decisions, compute energy budgets and duty-cycles, and to preform side-by-side comparison of different platforms. Based on our models we present a MATLAB Wireless Sensor Node Platform Lifetime Prediction and Simulation Package (MATSNL). This demonstrates the use of the models using sample applications drawn from existing sensor node measurements.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Cao, Q., Yan, T., Stankovic, J., and Abdelzaher, T. 2005. Analysis of target detection performance for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems (DCOSS).
3
 
4
 
5
6
 
7
Jung, D., Barton-Sweeney, A., Teixeira, T., and Savvides, A. 2007. Model-based design exploration of wireless sensor node lifetimes. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Wireless Sensor Networks (EWSN).
 
8
9
10
 
11
Mini, R. A. F., Machado, M. V., Loureiro, F. A., and Nath, B. 2005. Prediction-based energy map for wireless sensor networks. In Elsevier Ad-hoc Networks Journal (special issue on Ad Hoc Networking for Pervasive Systems).
 
12
Nachman, L. 2005. New tinyos platforms panel:iMote2. In Proceedings of the 2nd International TinyOS Technology Exchange.
 
13
 
14
 
15
Ross, S. M. 1996. Stochastic Processes, second edition, pp. 213--218. Jonn Wiley and Sons, Inc.
16
17
 
18
Vicaire, P., He, T., Yan, T., Cao, Q., Zhou, G., Gu, L., Luo, L., Stoleru, R., Stankovic, J. A., and Abdelzaher, T. 2006. Achieving long-term surveillance in vigilnet. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (Infocom).
19

Collaborative Colleagues:
Deokwoo Jung: colleagues
Thiago Teixeira: colleagues
Andreas Savvides: colleagues