ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Autonomic tuning expert: a framework for best-practice oriented autonomic database tuning
Full text PdfPdf (1.10 MB)
Source IBM Centre for Advanced Studies Conference archive
Proceedings of the 2008 conference of the center for advanced studies on collaborative research: meeting of minds table of contents
Ontario, Canada
SESSION: Databases table of contents
Article No. 3  
Year of Publication: 2008
Authors
David Wiese  Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany
Gennadi Rabinovitch  Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany
Michael Reichert  IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH, Boeblingen, Germany
Stephan Arenswald  IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH, Boeblingen, Germany
Sponsors
: IBM Toronto Software Lab
: IBM Centers for Advanced Studies (CAS)
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 14,   Downloads (12 Months): 120,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1463788.1463792
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Databases are growing rapidly in scale and complexity. High performance, availability, and further service level agreements need to be satisfied under any circumstances to please customers. In order to tune the DBMS within their complex environments, highly skilled database administrators (DBAs) are required. Unfortunately, they are becoming rarer and more and more expensive. Improving performance analysis and moving towards the automation of large information management platforms requires a more intuitive and flexible source of decision making.

This paper points out the importance of best-practices knowledge for autonomic database tuning and addresses the idea of formalizing and storing DBA expert tuning knowledge for the autonomic management process. We will focus our attention on the development of a reference system for best-practice oriented autonomic database tuning for IBM DB2 and subsequently evaluate our system's tuning performance under changing workload.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
A. Biazetti, K. Gajda. Achieving complex event processing with Active Correlation Technology. November 2005.
 
3
J. P. Bigus, J. L. Hellerstein, and M. S. Squillante. Auto Tune: A Generic Agent for Automated Performance Tuning. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Practical Application of Intelligent Agents and Multi-Agents, 2000.
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
W. J. Chen, U. Baumbach, M. Miskimen, et al. DB2 Performance Expert for Multiplatforms V2.2, March 2006.
 
8
 
9
S. Elnaffar, W. Powley, D. Benoit, et al. Today's DBMSs: How Autonomic Are They? First International Workshop on Autonomic Computing Systems, Prague, 2003.
 
10
Enterprise Management Associates: Practical Autonomic Computing - Roadmap to Self Managing Technology. White Paper. 2006.
 
11
P. Horn. Autonomic Computing: IBM's Perspective on the State of Information Technology. White Paper. IBM Research. 2001.
 
12
IBM Corp. Autonomic Computing Toolkit: Developer's Guide. Technical Report SC30-4083-02, IBM, August 2004.
 
13
 
14
IBM Corp. An Architectural Blueprint for Autonomic Computing. White Paper. IBM Research Lab, 2004.
 
15
IBM Corp. DB2 Universal Database - Administration Guide: Performance (Version 8). 2002.
 
16
IBM Corp. DB2 Universal Database - System Monitor Guide and Reference (Version 8). 2004.
 
17
 
18
M. Peleg, A. Boxwala, O. Ogunyemi, et al. GLIF3: The Evolution of a Guideline Representation Format. In Proceedings of the AMIA Fall Symposium, 2000.
 
19
M. Peleg, S. Tu, J. Bury, et al. Comparing Computer-interpretable Guideline Models: a Case Study Approach. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 10(1) (2003) 52--68
 
20
W. Powley, P. Martin. A Reflective Database-Oriented Framework for Autonomic Managers. In Proceedings of International Conference on Autonomic Systems, San Jose, CA, USA, 2006.
 
21
 
22
M. Sedlmayr, T. Rose, R. Röhring, et al. A workflow approach towards GLIF execution. In Proceedings on Workshop AI Techniques in Healthcare: Evidence-based Guidelines and Protocols. European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI), Trento, Italy, 2006.
 
23
 
24
TPC Benchmark#8482; C. Standard Specification. Revision 5.7. Transaction Processing Performance Council, 2006.
 
25
TPC Benchmark#8482; H. Standard Specification Revision 2.1.0. Transaction Processing Performance Council, 2003.
 
26
 
27
D. Wang, M. Peleg, D. Bu, et al. GESDOR - a Generic Execution Model for Sharing of Computer-interpretable Clinical Practice Guidelines. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings. 2003:694--8.
 
28
G. Weikum, A. C. Konig, A. Kraiss, et al. Towards Self Tuning Memory Management for Data Servers. Data Engineering Journal 22, 2 (1999) pp 3--11.
 
29

Collaborative Colleagues:
David Wiese: colleagues
Gennadi Rabinovitch: colleagues
Michael Reichert: colleagues
Stephan Arenswald: colleagues