ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Digital Library logoTake a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.
Semiotics artifacts, space and community: a case study on pinholes
Full text PdfPdf (1.14 MB)
Source Interaction Design and Children archive
Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Interaction design and children table of contents
Chicago, Illinois
WORKSHOP SESSION: Marginalized young people table of contents
Pages: 93-96  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-59593-994-4
Authors
Françoise Decortis  University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
Laura Lentini  University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 1,   Downloads (12 Months): 33,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1463689.1463728
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Given the fracturing of virtual and physical spaces, young people are less involved in their local surrounding spaces. Yet, investing the community space is related to sense of community and elicits social inclusion. We explore the complex relations among social inclusion, sense of community, spaces and artifacts through a case study on pinholes. Pinholes appeared to be powerful semiotics artifacts, simple to use, that allow equally empowered groups of participants of different ages and cultures to jointly explore, produce and share meanings about their territories and identities.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Ackermann, E., Chabert-Ramon, A., Decortis, F., Magli, R., Napoletano, L., & Owen, M. (2006). La piazza. Convivial spaces for intergenerational learning: what places for the digital age? Current developments in computer-assisted education, 3, pp. 1359--1363.
 
2
Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
 
3
Csikszntmihalyi, M. (2002). Flow. The classic work on how to achieve happiness. Auckland: Rider.
 
4
Gauthier, J. M., & Moukalou, R. (2007). De la guerre des boutons àà Harry Potter, un siècle d'évolution de l'espace-temps des adolescents. Bruxelles: Mardaga.
 
5
Mannarini, T., Tartaglia, S., Fedi, A., & Greganti, K. (2006). Image of neighborhood, self-image and sense of community. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26(3), 202--214.
 
6
Manzo, L. C. (2005). For better or worse: Exploring multiple dimensions of place meaning. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(1), 67--86.
 
7
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants, On the Horizon, 9(5), 1--6.
 
8
Rissotto, A., & Giuliani, V. (2006). Learning neighbourhood environments: the loss of experience in a modern world. In C. Spencer and M. Blades (Eds), Children and their environments, learning, using and designing spaces. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
 
9
Sarason, S. B. (1974). The psychological sense of community. Prospects for a community psychology. San Fransisco, CA: Josey-Bass.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Françoise Decortis: colleagues
Laura Lentini: colleagues