|
ABSTRACT
This paper deploys gait analysis for subject identification in multi-camera surveillance scenarios. We present a new method for viewpoint independent markerless gait analysis that does not require camera calibration and works with a wide range of directions of walking. These properties make the proposed method particularly suitable for gait identification in real surveillance scenarios where people and their behaviour need to be tracked across a set of cameras. Tests on 300 synthetic and real video sequences, with subjects walking freely along different walking directions, have been performed. Since the choice of the cameras' characteristics is a key-point for the development of a smart surveillance system, the performance of the proposed approach is measured with respect to different video properties: spatial resolution, frame-rate, data compression and image quality. The obtained results show that markerless gait analysis can be achieved without any knowledge of camera's position and subject's pose. The extracted gait parameters allow recognition of people walking from different views with a mean recognition rate of 92.2% and confirm that gait can be effectively used for subjects' identification in a multi-camera surveillance scenario.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
www.cc.gatech.edu/cpl/projects/hid.
|
| |
2
|
Casia gait database. online, 2006.
|
| |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
B. Bhanu and J. Han. Human recognition on combining kinematic and stationary features. In Proc Int Conf AVBPA, pages 600--608, 2003.
|
| |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
I. Bouchrika and M. S. Nixon. Model-Based Feature Extraction for Gait Analysis and Recognition, volume 4418 of LNCS. Springer, 2007.
|
| |
7
|
Y. Cai, W. Chen, K. Huang, and T. Tan. Continuously tracking objects across multiple widely separated cameras. In ACCV (1), pages 843--852, 2007.
|
| |
8
|
T. Chau. A review of analytical techniques for gait data. Part 1: fuzzy, statistical and fractal methods. Gait Posture, 13(1):49--66, 2001.
|
| |
9
|
A. Chilgunde, P. Kumar, S. Ranganath, and H. WeiMin. Multi-camera target tracking in blind regions of cameras with non-overlapping fields of view.In British Machine Vision Conference, pages --, 2004.
|
| |
10
|
|
| |
11
|
J. Cutting and L. Kozlowski. Recognizing friends by their walk: gait perception without familiarity cues. Bull. Psychonom. Soc., 9:353--356, 1977.
|
| |
12
|
W. T. Dempster and G. R. L. Gaughran. Properties of body segments based on size and weight. Am J Anat, 120:33--54, 1965.
|
| |
13
|
|
| |
14
|
A. Gilbert and R. Bowden. Tracking objects across cameras by incrementally learning inter-camera colour calibration and patterns of activity. pages 125--136, 2006.
|
| |
15
|
M. Goffredo, R. D. Seely, J. N. Carter, and M. S. Nixon. Markerless view independent gait analysis with self-camera calibration. Proc. IEEE Conf. on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition, 2008.
|
| |
16
|
M. Goffredo, N. Spencer, D. Pearce, J. N. Carter, and M. S. Nixon. Human Perambulation as a Self Calibrating Biometric., volume 4778 of LNCS. Springer, 2007.
|
| |
17
|
R. Gross and J. Shi. The cmu motion of body (mobo) database. Technical Report CMU-RI-TR-01-18, Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, 2001.
|
| |
18
|
|
| |
19
|
W. Hu, T. Tan, L. Wang, and S. Maybank. A survey on visual surveillance of object motion and behaviors. IEEE Trans Systems Man Cybernetics, 34(3):334--352, 2004.
|
| |
20
|
P. Huang, C. Harris, and M. Nixon. Recognising humans by gait via parametric canonical space. J Artif Intell Eng, 13(4):359--366, 1999.
|
| |
21
|
T. Huang and S. Russell. Object identification in a bayesian context. In IJCAI97, pages 1276--1282, 1997.
|
| |
22
|
|
| |
23
|
|
| |
24
|
|
| |
25
|
S. Kang, J. Min, and J.-K. Paik. Multiple-camera tracking system with seamless object handover. volume 4303, pages 27--34. SPIE, 2001.
|
| |
26
|
V. Kettnaker and R. Zabih. Bayesian multi-camera surveillance. IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2:--259 Vol. 2, 1999.
|
| |
27
|
S. Khan and M. Shah. Consistent labeling of tracked objects in multiple cameras with overlapping fields of view. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE Transactions on, 25(10):1355--1360, Oct. 2003.
|
| |
28
|
D. Makris, T. Ellis, and J. Black. Bridging the gaps between cameras. Proc. IEEE Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2:II-205--II-210 Vol.2, June-2 July 2004.
|
| |
29
|
L. Middleton, D. K. Wagg, A. I. Bazin, J. N. Carter, and M. S. Nixon. Developing a non-intrusive biometric environment. Proc IEEE Int Conf IROS, pages 723--728, 2006.
|
| |
30
|
M. P. Murray, A. B. Drought, and R. C. Kory. Walking patterns of normal men. J Bone Joint Surgery, 46:335, 1964.
|
| |
31
|
|
| |
32
|
M. Nixon and A. Aguado. Feature Extraction & Image Processing. Academic Press, 2nd edition, Dec. 2007.
|
| |
33
|
M. S. Nixon and J. N. Carter. Automatic recognition by gait. Proc. of the IEEE, 94(11):2013--2024, 2006.
|
| |
34
|
|
| |
35
|
|
| |
36
|
|
| |
37
|
A. Rahimi, B. Dunagan, and T. Darrell. Simultaneous calibration and tracking with a network of non-overlapping sensors. Proc. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1:I-187--I-194 Vol.1, June-2 July 2004.
|
| |
38
|
J. Shutler, M. Grant, M. S. Nixon, and J. N. Carter. On a large sequence-based human gait database. In Proc Int Conf Recent Advances in Soft Computing, pages 66--72, 2002.
|
 |
39
|
|
| |
40
|
|
| |
41
|
G. Veres, L. Gordon, J. Carter, and M. Nixon. What image information is important in silhouette-based gait recognition? Proc IEEE Conf CVPR, 2:II-776--II-782 Vol.2, 2004.
|
| |
42
|
L. Wang, T. Tan, W. Hu, and H. Ning. Automatic gait recognition based on statistical shape analysis. IEEE Trans IP, 12(9):1120--1131, 2003.
|
| |
43
|
|
| |
44
|
Y. Yamada. Advanced method for improvement of obscure video image. Proc. IEEE 33rd Annual Carnahan Conference on Security Technology, pages 440--445, 1999.
|
| |
45
|
|
|