ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Content-based ontology matching for GIS datasets
Full text PdfPdf (204 KB)
Source
Geographic Information Systems archive
Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGSPATIAL international conference on Advances in geographic information systems table of contents
Irvine, California
POSTER SESSION: Poster session table of contents
Article No. 51  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-323-5
Authors
Jeffrey Partyka  University of Texas at Dallas
Neda Alipanah  University of Texas at Dallas
Latifur Khan  University of Texas at Dallas
Bhavani Thuraisingham  University of Texas at Dallas
Shashi Shekhar  University of Minnesota
Sponsors
: Google
: Oak Ridge National Laboratory
: ESRI
Microsoft : Microsoft
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 17,   Downloads (12 Months): 159,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1463434.1463496
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The alignment of separate ontologies by matching related concepts continues to attract great attention within the database and artificial intelligence communities, especially since semantic heterogeneity across data sources remains a widespread and relevant problem. In particular, the Geographic Information System (GIS) domain presents unique forms of semantic heterogeneity that require a variety of matching approaches.

Our approach considers content-based techniques for aligning GIS ontologies. We examine the associated instance data of the compared concepts and apply a content-matching strategy to measure similarity based on value types based on N-grams present in the data. We focus special attention on a method applying the concepts of mutual information and N-grams by developing 2 separate variations and testing them over GIS dataset including multi-jurisdictions. In order to align concepts, first we find the appropriate columns. For this, we will exploit mutual information between two columns based on the type distribution of their content. Intuitively, if two columns are semantically same, type distribution should be very similar. We justify the conceptual validity of our ontology alignment technique with a series of experimental results that demonstrate the efficacy and utility of our algorithms on a wide-variety of authentic GIS data.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Guillermo Nudelman Hess, Cirano Iochpe, Alfio Ferrara, Silvana Castano, "Towards Effective Geographic Ontology Matching," GeoS 2007, pp. 51--65.
 
3
William Sunna, "Multilayered Approach to Aligning Heterogeneous Ontologies", Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois at Chicago, 2007.
 
4
William Sunna and Isabel Cruz, "Structure-based Methods to Enhance Geospatial Ontology Alignment", Second International Conference on Geospatial Semantics, Mexico City, Mexico, November 2007.
 
5
Bing Tian Dai, Nick Koudas, Divesh Srivastava, Anthony K. H. Tung, and Suresh Venkatasubramanian, "Validating Multicolumn Schema Matchings by Type," 24th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE), pp. 120--129, 2008.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Jeffrey Partyka: colleagues
Neda Alipanah: colleagues
Latifur Khan: colleagues
Bhavani Thuraisingham: colleagues
Shashi Shekhar: colleagues