ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Towards a geometric interpretation of double-cross matrix-based similarity of polylines
Full text PdfPdf (434 KB)
Source
Geographic Information Systems archive
Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGSPATIAL international conference on Advances in geographic information systems table of contents
Irvine, California
SESSION: Trajectories table of contents
Article No. 32  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-323-5
Authors
Bart Kuijpers  Hasselt University & Transnational University of Limburg, Belgium
Bart Moelans  Hasselt University & Transnational University of Limburg, Belgium
Sponsors
: Google
: Oak Ridge National Laboratory
: ESRI
Microsoft : Microsoft
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 10,   Downloads (12 Months): 79,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1463434.1463475
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

One of the formalisms to qualitatively describe polylines in the plane are double-cross matrices. In a double-cross matrix the relative position of any two line segments in a polyline is described with respect to a double cross based on their start points. Two polylines are called DC-similar if their double-cross matrices are identical. Although double-cross matrices have been widely applied, a geometric interpretation of the similarity they express is still lacking. In this paper, we provide a first step in the geometric interpretation of this qualitative definition of similarity. In particular, we give an effective characterization of what DC-similarity means for polylines that are drawn on a grid. We also provide algorithms that, given a DC-matrix, check whether it is realizable by a polyline on a grid and that construct, if possible, in quadratic time example polylines that satisfy this matrix. We also describe algorithms to reconstruct polylines, satisfying a given double-cross matrix, in the two-dimensional plane, that is, not necessarily on a grid.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Mathematica 6. http://www.wolfram.com.
 
2
Qepcad. http://www.cs.usna.edu/~qepcad.
 
3
Redlog. http://www.fmi.uni-passau.de/~redlog.
 
4
B. Caviness and J. Johnson, editors. Quantifier Elimination and Cylindrical Algebraic Decomposition. Springer, 1998.
 
5
A. G. Cohn and J. Renz. Qualitative spatial representation and reasoning. In Handbook of Knowledge Representation, chapter 13, pages 551--596. Elsevier, 2007.
 
6
N. V. de Weghe. Representing and Reasoning about Moving Objects: A Qualitative Approach. PhD thesis, Ghent University, Faculty of Sciences, Department of Geography, 2004.
 
7
N. V. de Weghe, B. Kuijpers, P. Bogaert, and P. D. Maeyer. A qualitative trajectory calculus and the composition of its relations. In GeoS, volume 3799 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 60--76. Springer, 2005.
 
8
M. J. Egenhofer and D. M. Mark. Naive geography. In COSIT, pages 1--15, 1995.
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
R. H. Güting and M. Schneider. Moving Objects Databases. Morgan Kaufmann, 2005.
13
 
14
M. Nanni, B. Kuijpers, C. Körner, M. May, and D. Pedreschi. Spatiotemporal data mining. In Mobility, Data Mining and Privacy, chapter 10, pages 267--296. Springer, 2008.
15
16
17
 
18
 
19
K. Zimmermann and C. Freksa. Qualitative spatial reasoning using orientation, distance, and path knowledge. Appl. Intell., 6(1):49--58, 1996.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Bart Kuijpers: colleagues
Bart Moelans: colleagues