ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Density based co-location pattern discovery
Full text PdfPdf (3.58 MB)
Source
Geographic Information Systems archive
Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGSPATIAL international conference on Advances in geographic information systems table of contents
Irvine, California
SESSION: OLAP and co-location mining table of contents
Article No. 29  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-323-5
Authors
Xiangye Xiao  Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong
Xing Xie  Microsoft Research Asia, Beijing, P.R. China
Qiong Luo  Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong
Wei-Ying Ma  Microsoft Research Asia, Beijing, P.R. China
Sponsors
: Google
: Oak Ridge National Laboratory
: ESRI
Microsoft : Microsoft
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 28,   Downloads (12 Months): 178,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1463434.1463471
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Co-location pattern discovery is to find classes of spatial objects that are frequently located together. For example, if two categories of businesses often locate together, they might be identified as a co-location pattern; if several biologic species frequently live in nearby places, they might be a co-location pattern. Most existing co-location pattern discovery methods are generate-and-test methods, that is, generate candidates, and test each candidate to determine whether it is a co-location pattern. In the test step, we identify instances of a candidate to obtain its prevalence. In general, instance identification is very costly. In order to reduce the computational cost of identifying instances, we propose a density based approach. We divide objects into partitions and identifying instances in dense partitions first. A dynamic upper bound of the prevalence for a candidate is maintained. If the current upper bound becomes less than a threshold, we stop identifying its instances in the remaining partitions. We prove that our approach is complete and correct in finding co-location patterns. Experimental results on real data sets show that our method outperforms a traditional approach.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
V. Estivill-Castro and I. Lee. Data mining techniques for autonomous exploration of large volumes of geo-referenced crime data. Proceedings of Geocomputation, pages 24--26, 2001.
 
3
4
 
5
 
6
7
 
8
 
9
10
 
11
S. Shekhar and Y. Huang. Co-location rules mining: A summary of results. SSTD, 2001.
 
12
13
14

Collaborative Colleagues:
Xiangye Xiao: colleagues
Xing Xie: colleagues
Qiong Luo: colleagues
Wei-Ying Ma: colleagues