|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ABSTRACT
Co-location pattern discovery is to find classes of spatial objects that are frequently located together. For example, if two categories of businesses often locate together, they might be identified as a co-location pattern; if several biologic species frequently live in nearby places, they might be a co-location pattern. Most existing co-location pattern discovery methods are generate-and-test methods, that is, generate candidates, and test each candidate to determine whether it is a co-location pattern. In the test step, we identify instances of a candidate to obtain its prevalence. In general, instance identification is very costly. In order to reduce the computational cost of identifying instances, we propose a density based approach. We divide objects into partitions and identifying instances in dense partitions first. A dynamic upper bound of the prevalence for a candidate is maintained. If the current upper bound becomes less than a threshold, we stop identifying its instances in the remaining partitions. We prove that our approach is complete and correct in finding co-location patterns. Experimental results on real data sets show that our method outperforms a traditional approach. REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
INDEX TERMS
Primary Classification:
Additional Classification:
General Terms:
Keywords:
Collaborative Colleagues:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||