Psychologically structured approach to user experience in games

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

Psychologically structured approach to user experience in games

Full text

Pdf (435 KB)

Source

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Vol. 358 archive
Proceedings of the 5th Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction: building bridges table of contents

Lund, Sweden

SESSION: Short papers table of contents

Pages 487-490

Year of Publication: 2008

ISBN:978-1-59593-704-9

Authors

Jeppe Komulainen	Helsingin yliopisto, Helsinki, FIN
Jari Takatalo	Helsingin yliopisto, Helsinki, FIN
Miikka Lehtonen	Helsingin yliopisto, Helsinki, FIN
Göte Nyman	Helsingin yliopisto, Helsinki, FIN

Sponsors

: Mangold International
: Microsoft Dynamics

Publisher

ACM New York, NY, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 13, Downloads (12 Months): 109, Citation Count: 0

Additional Information:

abstract references index terms collaborative colleagues

Tools and Actions:	Request Permissions Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTeX EndNote ACM Ref

DOI Bookmark:	Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1463160.1463226 What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

User experience (UX) in digital games has recently become a common topic of research. Despite association between psychology and experiences is clear, results have often been inadequately explicated by using psychological terms. In this study we explore the variety of experiences (i.e. positive and negative) that are received from playing digital games. The main aim is to integrate gamers' descriptions of their UX to theoretical constructs in psychology to reach a more analytic approach to the topic. The results suggested that user experiences are versatile in nature but they consist of four major constructs: cognition, motivation, emotion and focused attention. In addition to the main findings, gender was related on how gaming was experienced. As a conclusion, this study offers a solid and empirical-based terminology for communicating about UX in games. Also, the results can be utilized in developing models and measurement tools for UX in games in future.

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	Barret, L. F. 2006. Valence is a basic building block of emotional life. J. Res. Pers., 40, 35--55.
	2	Bonnano, P. & Kommers, P. 2005. Gender differences and styles in the use of digital games. Educational Psychology, 25, 13--41.
	3	Emily Brown , Paul Cairns, A grounded investigation of game immersion, CHI '04 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, April 24-29, 2004, Vienna, Austria [doi>10.1145/985921.986048]
	4	Cohen, J. 1960. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ. Psychol. Meas., 20, 37--46.
	5	Csikszentmihalyi, M. 1975. Beyond boredom and anxiety: Experiencing flow in work and play. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.
	6	Damasio, A. 1994. Descartes' error: emotion, reason and the brain. New York: Grosset/Putnam.
	7	Dewey, J. 1934. Art as experience. New York: Capricorn Books.
	8	Eccles, J. S. & Wigfield, A. 2002. Motivational beliefs, values and goals. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 53, 109--132.
	9	James, W. 1890. The principles of psychology. NY: Holt.
	10	Hilgard, E. R. 1980. The trilogy of mind: Cognition, affection, and conation. J. Hist. Behav. Sci., 16, 107--117.
	11	Lombard, M. & Ditton, T. B. (1997). At the heart of it all: The concept of presence. J. Comput.-Mediat. Comm., 3.
	12	Nyman, G., Radun, J., Leisti, T., and Vuori, T. 2005. From image fidelity to subjective quality: a hybrid qualitative/quantitative methodology for measuring subjective image quality for different image contents. In Proc. IDW '05 (2005), Takamatsu, Japan, 1817--1820.
	13	Richardson, A. 1999. Subjective experience: Its conceptual status, method of investigation, and psychological significance. J. Psychol., 133, 469--485.
	14	Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. 2000. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemp. Educ. Psychol., 25, 54--67.
	15	Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. 1998. Basics of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE.
	16	Takatalo J., Häkkinen, J., Komulainen J., Särkelä, H. & Nyman, G. 2004. The experiential dimensions of two different digital games. In Proc Presence 2004, UPV (2004), 274--278.
	17	Takatalo, J., Häkkinen, J., Kaistinen, J. & Nyman, G. (2007). Measuring user experience in digital gaming: Theoretical and methodological issues. In Proc. EI 2007, San Jose, USA, 1--13.