ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Toward a best practice for laboratory-based usability evaluations of mobile ICT for hospitals
Full text PdfPdf (645 KB)
Source
ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Vol. 358 archive
Proceedings of the 5th Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction: building bridges table of contents
Lund, Sweden
SESSION: Full papers table of contents
Pages 3-12  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-59593-704-9
Authors
Ole Andreas Alsos  Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
Yngve Dahl  Telenor Research and Innovation, Trondheim, Norway
Sponsors
: Mangold International
: Microsoft Dynamics
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 31,   Downloads (12 Months): 137,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1463160.1463162
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The dynamic nature of clinical work makes it challenging to assess the usability of mobile information and communication technology (ICT) for hospitals. To achieve some of the realism of field evaluations, combined with the control of laboratory-based evaluations, we have conducted usability tests of prototypes in a laboratory custom designed as a full-scale ward section. Nurses and physicians acting out simulated clinical scenarios have used the prototypes.

This paper reports on the general methodological lessons learned from three such formative usability evaluations. We have learned that the physical test environment, the test scenarios, and the prototypes form three variables that need to reflect a sufficient amount of realism and concreteness in order to help generate valid test results. At the same time, these variables are tools that can help control and focus the evaluation on specific issues that one wants to gather data on. We have also learned that encouraging reflection among participants and using detailed multi-perspective recordings of usage can help form a more precise understanding of how mobile ICT can accommodate clinical work.

The current paper aims to inform work toward a best practice for laboratory-based evaluations of mobile ICT for hospitals.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Dahl, Y. Ubiquitous Computing at Point of Care in Hospitals: A User-Centered Approach. Doctoral thesis. Norwegian University of Science and Technology (2007).
 
2
3
 
4
Tamminen, S., Oulasvirta, A., Toiskallio, K. and Kankainen, A. Understanding Mobile Contexts. Mobile HCI (2003).
 
5
Kjeldskov, J. and Skov, M. B. Studying Usability in Sitro: Simulating Real World Phenomena in Controlled Environments. IJHCI, 27, 1 (2007), 7--37.
 
6
Kjeldskov, J., Skov, M. B., Als, B. S. and Høegh, R. T. Is it Worth the Hassle? Exploring the Added Value of Evaluating the Usability of Context-Aware Mobile Systems in the Field. Mobile HCI (2004), 272--280.
7
 
8
ISO 9241-11 Ergonomic Requirements for Office Work with Visual Display Terminals (VDTs) -- Part 11: Guidance on Usability (1998).
 
9
10
11
12
 
13
14
 
15
Alsos, O. A. Attention and usability issues in mobile health information systems at point-of-care. MIE (2008).
 
16
 
17
Bødker, S. Scenarios in user-centred design---setting the stage for reflection and action. Interacting with Computers, 13, 1 (2000), 61--75.
18
 
19
Anderson, M. B., Stillman, P. L. and Wang, Y. Growing use of standardized patients in teaching and evaluation in medical education. Teach Learn Med, 6, 1 (1994), 15--22.
 
20
21
22
 
23
Kjeldskov, J. and Skov, M. B. Creating Realistic Laboratory Settings: Comparative Studies of Three Think-Aloud Usability Evaluations of a Mobile System. Interact (2003), 663--670.
 
24
Grudin, J. and Pruitt, J. Personas, Participatory Design and Product Development: An Infrastructure for Engagement. Proc. PDC (2002), 144--161.
 
25
Coiera, E.: Four rules for the reinvention of healthcare. British Medical Journal 328 (2004), 1197--1199
 
26
Sørby, I. D., Melby, L. and Nytrø, O. Characterising cooperation in the ward: framework for producing requirements to mobile electronic healthcare records. IJHTM, 7, 6 (2006), 506--521.
27

Collaborative Colleagues:
Ole Andreas Alsos: colleagues
Yngve Dahl: colleagues