|
ABSTRACT
Providing usable security mechanisms for Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) is one of the important tasks to foster WSN development, as they will increasingly be deployed in real-world settings in the future. Generally, due to its complexity, expert knowledge in the field of security is needed to plan, implement, and deploy a sound security setup. Frequently, no or only basic security mechanisms leave the WSN open to attacks of which the application designer might not be aware, especially if no security evaluation has been done. Furthermore, available security mechanisms have a great impact on the design of the application itself, i.e. to properly secure a protocol. We therefore propose a framework that first devises feasible security setups based on the characteristics of the envisioned application and second provides a security evaluation of theses possibilities from which the application designer is able to choose the fitting setup for his application. We have prototypically implemented the proposed scheme into the WSN middleware synthesis tool FABRIC and thus support the application designer in including a sound security solution into his application.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
Amol Bakshi , Viktor K. Prasanna , Jim Reich , Daniel Larner, The Abstract Task Graph: a methodology for architecture-independent programming of networked sensor systems, Proceedings of the 2005 workshop on End-to-end, sense-and-respond systems, applications and services, June 05-05, 2005, Seattle, Washington
|
| |
2
|
A. Becher, Z. Benenson, and M. Dornseif. Tampering with Motes: Real-World Physical Attacks on Wireless Sensor Networks. In Proc. of the 3rd Int. Conference on Security in Pervasive Computing, 2006.
|
| |
3
|
E. Chew, M. Swanson, K. Stine, N. Bartol, A. Brown, and W. Robinson. Performance Measurement Guide for Information Security. NIST Special Publication 800-55 (Rev. 1), July 2008.
|
| |
4
|
Paolo Costa , Geoff Coulson , Richard Gold , Manish Lad , Cecilia Mascolo , Luca Mottola , Gian Pietro Picco , Thirunavukkarasu Sivaharan , Nirmal Weerasinghe , Stefanos Zachariadis, The RUNES Middleware for Networked Embedded Systems and its Application in a Disaster Management Scenario, Proceedings of the Fifth IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications, p.69-78, March 19-23, 2007
[doi> 10.1109/PERCOM.2007.36]
|
| |
5
|
|
 |
6
|
|
| |
7
|
S. Han, E. Chang, L. Gao, and T. Dillon. Taxonomy of Attacks on Wireless Sensor Networks. In Proc. of the First European Conference on Computer Network Defence, 2005.
|
| |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Information technology -- Security techniques -- Information security management measurements. ISO/IEC 27004. Standard under Development.
|
 |
10
|
|
| |
11
|
|
| |
12
|
P. Levis, S. Madden, J. Polastre, R. Szewczyk, K. Whitehouse, A. Woo, D. Gay, J. Hill, M. Welsh, E. Brewer, and D. Culler. Ambient Intelligence, chapter TinyOS: An Operating System for Sensor Networks, pages 115--148. Springer, Berlin, 2005.
|
 |
13
|
Mark Luk , Ghita Mezzour , Adrian Perrig , Virgil Gligor, MiniSec: a secure sensor network communication architecture, Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Information processing in sensor networks, April 25-27, 2007, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
[doi> 10.1145/1236360.1236421]
|
 |
14
|
James Newsome , Elaine Shi , Dawn Song , Adrian Perrig, The sybil attack in sensor networks: analysis & defenses, Proceedings of the 3rd international symposium on Information processing in sensor networks, April 26-27, 2004, Berkeley, California, USA
[doi> 10.1145/984622.984660]
|
| |
15
|
D. Pfisterer, C. Buschmann, H. Hellbrück, and S. Fischer. Data-type centric middleware synthesis for wireless sensor network application development. In Proc. of the Fifth Annual Mediterranean Ad Hoc Networking Workshop, 2006.
|
| |
16
|
E. Platon and Y. Sei. Security software engineering in wireless sensor networks. Progress in Informatics, 5:49--64, Mar. 2008.
|
| |
17
|
S. Ransom, D. Pfisterer, and S. Fischer. Making Security Useable in Wireless Sensor Networks. In Proc. of the Int. Workshop on Sensor Network Engineering, 2008.
|
| |
18
|
T. Roosta, S. P. Shieh, and S. Sastry. Taxonomy of Security Attacks in Sensor Networks and Countermeasures. In Proc. of the 1st Int. Conference on System Integration and Reliability Improvements, 2006.
|
 |
19
|
Eric Sabbah , Adnan Majeed , Kyoung-Don Kang , Ke Liu , Nael Abu-Ghazaleh, An application-driven perspective on wireless sensor network security, Proceedings of the 2nd ACM international workshop on Quality of service & security for wireless and mobile networks, October 02-02, 2006, Terromolinos, Spain
[doi> 10.1145/1163673.1163675]
|
| |
20
|
B. Schneier. Attack Trees: Modeling Security Threats. Dr. Dobb's Journal, Dec. 1999.
|
| |
21
|
|
| |
22
|
F. Stajano, D. Cvrcek, and M. Lewis. Steel, Cast Iron and Concrete: Security Engineering for Real World Wireless Sensor Networks. In Proc. of the 6th Int. Conference on Applied Cryptography and Network Security, 2008.
|
| |
23
|
M.-M. Wang, J.-N. Cao, J. Li, and S. K. Das. Middleware for Wireless Sensor Networks: A Survey. Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 23(3):305--326, 2008.
|
| |
24
|
|
|