ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Digital Library logoTake a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.
Negative efficacy of fixed gain error reducing shared control for training in virtual environments
Full text PdfPdf (1.04 MB)
Source
ACM Transactions on Applied Perception (TAP) archive
Volume 6 ,  Issue 1  (February 2009) table of contents
Article No.: 3  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISSN:1544-3558
Authors
Yanfang Li  Rice University, Houston, TX
Volkan Patoglu  Sabanci University, Istanbul, Turkey
Marcia K. O'Malley  Rice University, Houston, TX
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 12,   Downloads (12 Months): 124,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1462055.1462058
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Virtual reality with haptic feedback provides a safe and versatile practice medium for many manual control tasks. Haptic guidance has been shown to improve performance of manual control tasks in virtual environments; however, the efficacy of haptic guidance for training in virtual environments has not been studied conclusively. This article presents experimental results that show negative efficacy of haptic guidance during training in virtual environments. The haptic guidance in this study is a fixed-gain error-reducing shared controller, with the control effort overlaid on the dynamics of the manual control task during training. Performance of the target-hitting manual control task in the absence of guidance is compared for three training protocols. One protocol contained no haptic guidance and represented virtual practice. Two protocols utilized haptic guidance, varying the duration of exposure to guidance during the training sessions. Exposure to the fixed-gain error-reducing shared controller had a detrimental effect on performance of the target-hitting task at the conclusion of a month-long training protocol, regardless of duration of exposure. While the shared controller was designed with knowledge of the task and an intuitive sense of the motions required to achieve good performance, the results indicate that the acquisition of motor skill is a complex phenomenon that is not aided with haptic guidance during training as implemented in this experiment.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Adams, R. J., Klowden, D., and Hannaford, B. 2001. Virtual traning for a manual assembly task. Haptics-e 2, 2.
 
2
Bernstein, N. 1967. The Coordnation and Regulation of Movements. Oxford/Pergamon.
 
3
Bettini, A., Marayong, P., Lang, S., and Okamura, A. M. 2002. Vision assisted control for manipulation using virtual fixtures: Experiments at macro and micro scales. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. 3354--3361.
 
4
Brashers-Krug, T., Shadmehr, R., and Bizzi, E. 1996. Consolidation in human motor memory. Nature, 252--255.
 
5
Emken, J. L. and Reinkensmeyer, D. J. 2005. Robot-enhanced motor learning: Accelerating internal model formation during locomotion by transient dynamic amplification. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehab. Engin. 13, 1, 33--39.
 
6
 
7
Gamberini, L. 2000. Virtual reality as a new research tool for the study of human memory. CyberPsych. Behav. 3, 3, 337--342.
 
8
Gillespie, R. B., S. O'Modhrain, P. T., Pham, C., and Zaretsky, D. 1998. Virtual teacher. In Proceedings of the ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. 3354--3361.
 
9
Griffiths, P. and Gillespie, R. B. 2005. Sharing control between human and automation using haptic interface: Primary and secondary task performance benefits. Human Factors 47, 3, 574--590.
 
10
Haanpaa, D. P. and Roston, G. P. 1997. An advanced haptic system for improving man-machine interfaces. Computers & Graphics 21, 4, 443--449.
 
11
Henmi, K. and Yoshikawa, T. 1998. Virtual lesson and its application to virtual calligraphy system. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. 1275--1280.
 
12
Huang, F. and Gillespie, R. B. 2007. Visual and haptic feedback contribute to tuning and online control during object manipulation. J. Motor Behav. 39, 179--193.
 
13
 
14
Kahn, L. E., Rymer, W. Z., and Reinkensmeyer, D. J. 2004. Adaptive assistance for guided force training in chronic stroke. In Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Vol. 1. 2722--2725.
 
15
Kikuuwe, R. and Yoshikawa, T. 2001. Haptic display device with fingertip presser for motion/force teaching to human. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. 868--873.
 
16
Kozak, J. J., Hancock, P. A., Arthur, E. J., and Chrysler, S. T. 1993. Transfer of training from virtual reality. Ergonomics 36, 1, 777--784.
 
17
Li, Y., Patoglu, V., and O'Malley, M. K. 2006. Shared control for training in virtual environments: Learning through demonstration? In EuroHaptics 2006.
 
18
 
19
Lintern, G. and Roscoe, S. N. 1980. Visual cue Augmentation in Contact Flight Simulation. Aviation Psychology. Iowa State University Press.
 
20
 
21
Massimino, M. J. and Sheridan, T. B. 1994. Teleoperator performance with varying force and visual feedback. Human Factors 36, 1, 145--157.
 
22
Meech, J. F. and Solomonides, A. E. 1996. User requirements when interacting with virtual objects. Virtual Reality—User Issues 68, 1, 1--3.
 
23
Nudehi, S. S., Mukherjee, R., and Ghodoussi, M. 2005. A shared control approach to haptic interface design for minimally invasive telesurgical training. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Tech. 13, 4, 588--592.
 
24
 
25
O'Malley, M. K., Gupta, A., Gen, M., and Li, Y. 2006. Shared control in haptic systems for performance enhancement and training. ASME J. Dynamic Syst. Measur. Control (Special Issue on Novel Robotics and Control) 128, 1, 75--85.
 
26
O'Malley, M. K., Hughes, K. J., Magruder, D. F., and Ambrose, R. O. 2003. Simulated bilateral teleoperation of robonaut. In Proceedings of the AIAA Space Conference.
 
27
Patton, J. L. and Mussa-Ivaldi, F. A. 2004. Robot-asisted adaptive training: Custom force fields for teaching movement patterns. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Engin. 51, 4, 636--646.
 
28
Patton, J. L., Mussa-Ivaldi, F. A., and Rymer, W. Z. 2001. Altering movement patterns in healthy and brain-injured subjects via custom designed robotic forces. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference of Engineering Medicine Biology Society. 1356--1359.
 
29
Richard, P. and Coiffet, P. 1995. Human perceptual issues in virtual environments: sensory substitution and information redundancy. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop in Robot and Human Communication. 301--306.
 
30
Rosenburg, L. B. 1993. Virtual fixtures: Perceptual tools for telerobotic manipulation. In Proceedings of the IEEE Annual Virtual Reality International Symposium. 76--82.
 
31
Shadmehr, R., Brashers-Krug, T., and Mussa-Ivaldi, F. 1995. Interference in learning internal models of inverse dynamics in humans. In Advance in Neutral Information Processing Systems, 1117--1124.
 
32
Shadmehr, R. and Mussa-Ivaldi, F. A. 1994. Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. J. Neurosci. 14, 3208--3224.
 
33
Siipola, E. M. and Israel, H. E. 1993. Habit interferences as dependent upon stage of training. Amer. J. Psych. 45, 205--227.
 
34
Sterr, A., Elbert, T., Berthold, I., Klbel, S., Rockstroh, B., and Taub, E. 2002. Longer versus shorter daily constraint-induced movement therapy of chronic hemiparesis: An exploratory study. Archives Physical Med. Rehab. 83, 10, 1374--1377.
 
35
Todorov, E., Shadmehr, P., and Bizzi, E. 1997. Augmented feedback presented in a virtual environment accelerates learning of a difficult motor task. J. Motor Behav. 29, 2, 147--158.
 
36
Williams, L. E. P., Loftin, R. B., Aldridge, H. A., Leiss, E. L., and Bluethmann, W. 2002. Kinesthetic and visual force display for telerobotics. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. 1249--1254.
 
37
Wolpert, D. M. and Jordan, Z. G. M. I. 1995. Are arm trajectories planned in kinematic or dynamic coordinates? An adaptation study. Exper. Brain Resear. 103, 3, 460--470.
 
38
Yokokohji, Y., Hollis, R., Kanade, T., and Henmi, K. 1996. Toward machine mediated training of motor skill. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Communication. 32--37.
 
39
Yoneda, M., Arai, F., Fukuda, T., Miyata, K., and Naito, T. 1999. Assistance system for crane operation with haptic display: Operational assistance to suppress round payload swing. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. 2924--2929.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Yanfang Li: colleagues
Volkan Patoglu: colleagues
Marcia K. O'Malley: colleagues