ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A unified information-theoretic framework for viewpoint selection and mesh saliency
Full text PdfPdf (24.51 MB)
Source
ACM Transactions on Applied Perception (TAP) archive
Volume 6 ,  Issue 1  (February 2009) table of contents
Article No. 1  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISSN:1544-3558
Authors
Miquel Feixas  University of Girona, Girona, Spain
Mateu Sbert  University of Girona, Girona, Spain
Francisco González  University of Girona, Girona, Spain
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 25,   Downloads (12 Months): 148,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1462055.1462056
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Viewpoint selection is an emerging area in computer graphics with applications in fields such as scene exploration, image-based modeling, and volume visualization. In particular, best view selection algorithms are used to obtain the minimum number of views (or images) in order to understand or model an object or scene better. In this article, we present a unified framework for viewpoint selection and mesh saliency based on the definition of an information channel between a set of viewpoints (input) and the set of polygons of an object (output). The mutual information of this channel is shown to be a powerful tool to deal with viewpoint selection, viewpoint stability, object exploration and viewpoint-based saliency. In addition, viewpoint mutual information is extended using saliency as an importance factor, showing how perceptual criteria can be incorporated to our method. Although we use a sphere of viewpoints around an object, our framework is also valid for any set of viewpoints in a closed scene. A number of experiments demonstrate the robustness of our approach and the good behavior of the proposed measures.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Andújar, C., Vázquez, P. P., and Fairén, M. 2004. Way-finder: Guided tours through complex walkthrough models. Computer Graphics Forum (Eurographics 2004) 23, 3, 499--508.
 
2
Blanz, V., Tarr, M., and Bülthoff, H. 1999. What object attributes determine canonical views? Perception 28, 575--599.
 
3
Bordoloi, U. D. and Shen, H.-W. 2005. Viewpoint evaluation for volume rendering. In IEEE Visualization 2005. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 487--494.
 
4
Bülthoff, H., Edelman, S., and Tarr, M. 1995. How are three-dimensional objects represented in the brain? Cerebral Cortex 5, 247--260.
 
5
Burbea, J. and Rao, C. R. 1982. On the convexity of some divergence measures based on entropy functions. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 28, 3, 489--495.
 
6
Castelló, P., Sbert, M., Chover, M., and Feixas, M. 2007. Viewpoint entropy-driven simplification. In Proceedings of WSCG 2007. 249--256.
 
7
Christensen, P. Ambient occlusion, image-based illumination and global illumination. Photorealistic RenderMan Application Notes, Note 35.
 
8
 
9
Feixas, M. 2002. An information-theory framework for the study of the complexity of visibility and radiosity in a scene. Ph.D. thesis, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
10
 
11
González-Baños, H. H. and Latombe, J.-C. 2002. Navigation strategies for exploring indoor environments. Int. J. Robotics Resear. 21, 10-11, 829--848.
 
12
 
13
 
14
Itti, L. and Baldi, P. 2006. Bayesian surprise attracts human attention. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Vol. 19 (NIPS 2005). 1--8.
 
15
 
16
 
17
Landis, H. 2002. RenderMan in production. In Course Notes of ACM SIGGRAPH, ACM, New York, NY.
18
 
19
Lu, A., Maciejewski, R., and Ebert, D. S. 2006. Volume composition using eye tracking data. In Proceedings of EuroVis '06, ACM, New York, NY, 655--662.
 
20
Palmer, S., Rosch, E., and Chase, P. 1981. Canonical perspective and the perception of objects. Atten. Perform. IX, 135--151.
 
21
Plemenos, D. and Benayada, M. 1996. Intelligent display techniques in scene modeling. New techniques to automatically compute good views. In Proceedings of Graphi Con'96.
 
22
Polonsky, O., Patané, G., Biasotti, S., Gotsman, C., and Spagnuolo, M. 2005. What's in an image? Visual Computer 21, 8-10, 840--847.
 
23
Sbert, M., Plemenos, D., Feixas, M., and González, F. 2005. Viewpoint quality: Measures and applications. In Proceedings of 1st Computational Aesthetics in Graphics, Visualization and Imaging, 185--192.
 
24
Slonim, N. and Tishby, N. 1999. Agglomerative information bottleneck. In Proceedings of Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS). MIT Press, 617--623.
25
 
26
Sokolov, D., Plemenos, D., and Tamine, K. 2006. Methods and data structures for virtual world exploration. Visual Computer 22, 7, 506--516.
 
27
Takahashi, S., Fujishiro, I., Takeshima, Y., and Nishita, T. 2005. A feature-driven approach to locating optimal viewpoints for volume visualization. In Proceedings of IEEE Visualization 2005. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 495--502.
 
28
Tarr, M., Bülthoff, H., Zabinski, M., and Blanz, V. 1997. To what extent do unique parts influence recognition across changes in viewpoint? Psychol. Science 8, 4, 282--289.
 
29
 
30
Vázquez, P.-P., Feixas, M., Sbert, M., and Heidrich, W. 2003. Automatic view selection using viewpoint entropy and its applications to image-based modeling. Comput. Graph. For. 22, 4, 689--700.
 
31
Vázquez, P. P., Feixas, M., Sbert, M., and Llobet, A. 2006. Realtime automatic selection of good molecular views. Comput. Graph. 30, 1, 98--110.
 
32
 
33
 
34
Zhukov, S., Iones, A., and Kronin, G. 1998. An ambient light illumination model. In Proceedings of the Eurographics Workshop: Rendering Techniques. 45--56.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Miquel Feixas: colleagues
Mateu Sbert: colleagues
Francisco González: colleagues