|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ABSTRACT
One essential reason for people to publish on the web is to express themselves freely. YouTube facilitates this self-expression by allowing users to upload video content they generated. This paper investigates to what extent the videos on YouTube are self-generated content, instead of amalgamated content that was mainly professionally authored in the first place. Results show that most of the popular content on YouTube was professionally generated, even though a random sample shows that there is plenty of user-generated content available -- it just does not make the cut. As a result we propose that YouTube is more of a social filter, allowing anyone to share content they find interesting rather than a way for aspiring creative people to show their creative abilities to the world. The outcome is a set of requirements which describe better means for YouTube to support better authoring and presentation of video, where the core research direction is focused on the self-representation of humans in the realm of their creative possibilities on one side as well as the stimulation of new insights on existing material to stimulate new creative impulses. REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
INDEX TERMS
Primary Classification:
General Terms:
Keywords:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||