ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Towards a model of understanding social search
Full text PdfPdf (1.22 MB)
Source
Computer Supported Cooperative Work archive
Proceedings of the ACM 2008 conference on Computer supported cooperative work table of contents
San Diego, CA, USA
SESSION: Social sensemaking table of contents
Pages 485-494  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-007-4
Authors
Brynn M. Evans  University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
Ed H. Chi  Palo Alto Research Center, Palo Alto, CA, USA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 26,   Downloads (12 Months): 374,   Citation Count: 4
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1460563.1460641
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Search engine researchers typically depict search as the solitary activity of an individual searcher. In contrast, results from our critical-incident survey of 150 users on Amazon's Mechanical Turk service suggest that social interactions play an important role throughout the search process. Our main contribution is that we have integrated models from previous work in sensemaking and information seeking behavior to present a canonical social model of user activities before, during, and after search, suggesting where in the search process both explicitly and implicitly shared information may be valuable to individual searchers.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
M. Bates. Toward an integrated model of information seeking and searching. In The 4th Int'l Conf. on Information Needs, Seeking and Use in Different Contexts (Keynote address), September 11--13 2002.
3
4
 
5
 
6
C. W. Choo, B. Detlor, and D. Turnbull. Information seeking on the web: An integrated model of browsing and searching. In Proc. ASIS'99, ACM Press, pages 3--16, 1999.
 
7
 
8
9
 
10
J. Flanagan. The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51:327--358, 1954.
 
11
12
13
14
15
 
16
17
 
18
W. Jones and J. Teevan. Personal Information Management. University of Washington Press, Seattle, 2007.
19
20
 
21
C. C. Kuhlthau. Inside the search process: Information seeking from the user's perspective. JASIS, 42(5):361--371, 1991.
22
 
23
24
25
26
 
27
P. Pirolli and S. K. Card. Information foraging. Psychological Review, 106:643--675, 1999.
 
28
P. Pirolli and S. K. Card. The sensemaking process and leverage points for analyst technology as identified through cognitive task analysis. In Proc. Int'l Conf. on Intelligence Analysis'05, pages 2--4, 2005.
 
29
T. Rodden. A survey of CSCW systems. Interacting with Computers, 3(3):319--354, 1991.
30
 
31
J. Shepherd. The Information Needs and Information Seeking Behaviour of Polytechnic History Lecturers. British Library, London, 1983.
 
32
 
33
R. S. Taylor. Question-negotiation and information seeking in libraries. College & Research Libraries, 29(3):178--194, 1968.
 
34
 
35
T. Wilson. On user studies and information needs. Journal of Documentation, 37(1):3--15, 1981.
36


Collaborative Colleagues:
Brynn M. Evans: colleagues
Ed H. Chi: colleagues