ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Cutting into collaboration: understanding coordination in distributed and interdisciplinary medical research
Full text PdfPdf (464 KB)
Source
Computer Supported Cooperative Work archive
Proceedings of the ACM 2008 conference on Computer supported cooperative work table of contents
San Diego, CA, USA
SESSION: Interdisciplinary and distributed teams table of contents
Pages 427-436  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-007-4
Authors
Saeko Nomura  Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
Jeremy Birnholtz  Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
Oya Rieger  Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
Gilly Leshed  Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
Deborah Trumbull  Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
Geri Gay  Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 31,   Downloads (12 Months): 200,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1460563.1460632
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Coordinating goals, schedules, and tasks among collaborators is difficult, and made even more so when there are disciplinary, geographic and institutional boundaries that must be spanned. Designing CSCW tools to support coordination in these settings, however, requires an improved under-standing of the constraints and conflicts that impede effective collaboration. We present findings from a study of distributed collaborations between academic surgeons and biomedical engineering researchers. These two groups differ significantly in their work priorities and institutional contexts, but are nonetheless able to work together and co-ordinate effectively. They accomplish this via human mediation, frequent ad hoc communication, and optimizing the use of their limited face-to-face interaction opportunities.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
Atkins, D. E., Droegemeier, K. K., Feldman, S. I., Garcia-Molina, H., Klein, M. L. and Messina, P. Revolutionizing Science and Engineering through Cyberinfrastructure, National Science Foundation, Washington, DC, 2003.
 
3
Barley, S. R. Technicians in the workplace: Ethno-graphic evidence for bringing work into organization studies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, (1996). 404--441.
 
4
 
5
 
6
Cummings, J. and Kiesler, S. Coordination costs and project outcomes in multi-university collaborations. Research Policy, 36, 10 (2007). 138--152.
 
7
 
8
Finholt, T. A. Collaboratories as a new form of scientific organization. Economics of Innovation and New Technologies, 12, 1 (2003). 5--25.
 
9
Finholt, T.A. and Birnholtz, J. P. If we build it, will they come? the cultural challenges of cyberinfrastructure development. In NBIC Convergence 2004(2004).
 
10
Galison, P. and Hevly, B. Big Science: The Growth of Large-Scale Research. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, 1992.
 
11
Goffman, E. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Doubleday, Garden City, NY, 1959.
 
12
Grady, D. and Altman, L. K. Global collaboration bears fruit as SARS gives up some secrets. The New York Times, 1, May 26, 2003.
 
13
Hagstrom, W. The Scientific Community. Basic Books, New York, 1965.
14
 
15
Hargens, L. L. Patterns of Scientific Research. American Sociological Association, Washington, DC, 1975.
 
16
Haythornthwaite, C., Lunsford, K. J., Bowker, G. C., and Bruce, B. Challenges for research and practice in distributed, interdisciplinary, collaboration. In C. Hine (Ed.), New Infrastructures for Science Knowledge Production. Idea Group, Hershey, PA, 2006.
17
18
 
19
Hutchins, E. Cognition in the Wild. MIT Pressfield, Cambridge, MA, 1995.
 
20
Knorr, C. K. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1999.
 
21
22
23
24
 
25
March, J. and Simon, H. Organizations. Wiley, New York, NY, 1955.
 
26
Mervis, J. Marburger asks social scientists for a helping hand in interpreting data. Science, 308, (2005). 617.
 
27
Nentwich, M. Cyberscience: Research in the Age of the Internet. Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna, 2003.
 
28
29
 
30
Powell, W. Learning from collaboration: Knowledge and networks in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries. California Management Review, 40, 3 (1998). 228--240.
 
31
Pratt, M. G. and Rafaeli, A. Organizational dress as a symbol of multilayered social identities. Acad. Management J, 40, (1997). 862--899.
 
32
 
33
 
34
Shrum, W., Genuth, J. and Chompalov, I. Structures of Scientific Collaboration. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2007.
 
35
Thompson, J.D. Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1967.
 
36
Van De Ven, A.H., Delbecq, A. L. and Koenig Jr., R. Determinants of coordination modes within organizations. American Sociological Review, 41, 2 (1976). 322--338.
 
37
Whitley, R. The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000.
38

Collaborative Colleagues:
Saeko Nomura: colleagues
Jeremy Birnholtz: colleagues
Oya Rieger: colleagues
Gilly Leshed: colleagues
Deborah Trumbull: colleagues
Geri Gay: colleagues