ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Public vs. private: comparing public social network information with email
Full text PdfPdf (540 KB)
Source
Computer Supported Cooperative Work archive
Proceedings of the ACM 2008 conference on Computer supported cooperative work table of contents
San Diego, CA, USA
SESSION: Naughty social networking table of contents
Pages 393-402  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-007-4
Authors
Ido Guy  IBM Haifa Research Lab, Haifa, Israel
Michal Jacovi  IBM Haifa Research Lab, Haifa, Israel
Noga Meshulam  IBM Haifa Research Lab, Haifa, Israel
Inbal Ronen  IBM Haifa Research Lab, Haifa, Israel
Elad Shahar  IBM Haifa Research Lab, Haifa, Israel
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 54,   Downloads (12 Months): 454,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1460563.1460627
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The goal of this research is to facilitate the design of systems which will mine and use sociocentric social networks without infringing privacy. We describe an extensive experiment we conducted within our organization comparing social network information gathered from various intranet public sources with social network information gathered from a private source - the organizational email system. We also report the conclusions of a series of interviews we conducted based on our experiment. The results shed light on the richness of public social network information, its characteristics, and added value over email network information.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Adamic, L. A., and Adar, E. Friends and neighbors on the Web, Social Networks, 25, 3 (2003), 211--230.
2
3
 
4
5
 
6
Boykin, P. O. and Roychowdhury, V. Personal Email Networks: An Effective Anti-Spam Tool, IEEE Computer, V. 38, (2004), p 61.
7
 
8
Cross, R., Parker, A. The Hidden Power of Social Networks: Understanding How Work Really Gets Done in Organizations, Harvard Business School Press (2004).
 
9
Culotta, A., Bekkerman, R., and McCallum, A. Extracting social networks and contact information from email and the Web. First Conference on Email and Anti-Spam (2004).
10
 
11
Diaconis, P. Group Representation in Probability and Statistics, IMS Lecture Notes Monogr. Ser. 11, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Hayward, CA, (1988).
 
12
DiMicco, J. M., Millen, D. R. People Sensemaking with Social Networking Sites, The Sensemaking Workshop, CHI 2008, (2008).
13
 
14
Dunbar, R. I. M. Neocortex size as a constraint on group size in primates, JHE 22 (1992), 469--493.
 
15
 
16
Farnham, S., Portnoy, W., Turski, A., Cheng, L., and Vronay, D. Personal Map: Automatically modeling the user's online social network. Proc. INTERACT'03, IOS Press (2003), 567--574.
17
 
18
Gladwell, M. The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference. 2000.
 
19
Granovetter, M. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78, 6 (1973), 1360--1380.
 
20
Grippa F., Zilli A., Laubacher R., and Gloor P. E-mail may not reflect the social network, International Sunbelt Social Network Conference 2006.
21
22
 
23
24
 
25
Kendall, M., and Gibbons, J. D. Rank Correlation Methods, Edward Arnold, London, 1990.
 
26
Lancaster, F. W., and Fayen, E. G. Information Retrieval On-Line. Melville Publishing Co. (1973), Chapter 6.
 
27
 
28
 
29
Mika, P. Flink: Semantic Web technology for the extraction and analysis of social networks. Journal of Web Semantics, 3, 2 (2005), 211--223.
 
30
Mika, P. Ontologies are us: A unified model of social networks and semantics. In Proc. ISWC2005, (2005).
 
31
Millen, D. R., Feinberg, J., and Kerr, B. Dogear: Social Bookmarking in the Enterprise. CHI 2006, April 22--27, 2006.
32
 
33
Neustaedter, C., Brush, A., Smith, M., and Fisher, D. The social network and relationship finder: Social sorting for email triage. In Proc. CEAS (2005).
 
34
Newman, M. E. J. Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. In Proc. of the National Academy of Science, USA, 101, (2004), 5200--5205.
 
35
O'Reilly, T. What is Web 2.0. 2005. http://www.oreillynet.com/go/web2.
36
 
37
Smith, M. Invisible crowds in cyberspace: Measuring and mapping the social structure of Usenet. In Communities in Cyberspace. Routledge Press, (1999).
 
38
 
39
 
40
Waber, B. N., Olguin O., Daniel, K., Taemie, M., Akshay, A. K., and Pentland, A. Organizational Engineering Using Sociometric Badges. (2007).: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1073342 .
 
41
Wasserman, S., and Faust, K. Social Network Analysis. (1994).


Collaborative Colleagues:
Ido Guy: colleagues
Michal Jacovi: colleagues
Noga Meshulam: colleagues
Inbal Ronen: colleagues
Elad Shahar: colleagues