ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Influences on tag choices in del.icio.us
Full text PdfPdf (721 KB)
Source
Computer Supported Cooperative Work archive
Proceedings of the ACM 2008 conference on Computer supported cooperative work table of contents
San Diego, CA, USA
SESSION: Social tagging table of contents
Pages 239-248  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-007-4
Authors
Emilee Rader  University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Rick Wash  University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 31,   Downloads (12 Months): 319,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1460563.1460601
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Collaborative tagging systems have the potential to produce socially constructed information organization schemes. The effectiveness of tags for finding and re-finding information depends upon how individual users choose tags; however, influences on users' tag choices are poorly understood. We quantitatively test competing hypotheses from the literature concerning these choices, using data from del.icio.us (a collaborative tagging system for organizing web bookmarks) and a computer model of possible tag choice strategies. We find evidence that users choose tags in a pattern consistent with personal information management goals, rather than as a result of social influence.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
A. Agresti. An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis. Wiley, second edition, 2007.
2
 
3
R. Axtell, R. Axelrod, J. M. Epstein, and M. D. Cohen. Aligning simulation models: A case study and results. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 1(2):123--141, 1996.
 
4
A. Clauset, C. R. Shalizi, and M. E. J. Newman. Power-law distributions in empirical data. http://arxiv.org/abs/0706.1062v1, June 2007.
5
6
 
7
G. Furnas, T. Landauer, L. Gomez, and S. Dumais. Statistical semantics: Analysis of the potential performance of key-word information systems. The Bell System Technical Journal, 62(6):1753--1806, 1983.
 
8
 
9
10
 
11
G. G. Judge, W. E. Griffiths, R. C. Hill, H. Lütkepohl, and T.-C. Lee. The Theory and Practice of Econometrics, Ch. 22. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. Wiley, New York, 2nd edition, 1985.
 
12
M. Lansdale. The psychology of personal information management. Applied Ergonomics, 19(1):55--66, 1988.
 
13
 
14
C. Marlow, M. Naaman, d. boyd, and M. Davis. Position paper, tagging, taxonomy, flickr, article, toread. In WWW '06 Collaborative Tagging Workshop, 2006.
 
15
S. Menard. Applied Logistic Regression Analysis. Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences. Sage University Press, 2002.
 
16
D. Millen, M. Yang, S. Whittaker, and J. Feinberg. Social bookmarking and exploratory search. In ECSCW '07, 21--40, 2007.
17
18
 
19
M. E. J. Newman. Power laws, pareto distributions and zipf's law. Contemporary Physics, 46:323--351, 2005.
 
20
S. Page. Path dependence. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 1(87--115), 2006.
 
21
P. Pirolli. Rational analyses of information foraging on the web. Cognitive Science, 29(3):343--373, 2005.
22
23
24
25
 
26
R. Wash and E. Rader. Public bookmarks and private benefits: An analysis of incentives in social computing. In ASIS&T '07, 2007.