Resilience in collaboration: technology as a resource for new patterns of action

ABSTRACT

In CSCW, there has been little or no attention given to how people use technology to restore collaborations when there is a major environmental disruption. We are especially interested in studying resilience in collaboration-the extent to which people continue to collaborate with work groups or to socialize despite prolonged disruption. We conducted an empirical study of people living in two countries that experienced prolonged disruption through war in their work and personal lives. We describe how technology played a major role in providing people with alternative resources to reconstruct, modify, and develop new routines, or patterns of action, for work and socializing. People created new assemblages of technological and physical resources. We discuss how the use of new resources in creating new routines led to more of a reliance on virtual work and in some cases to deeper structural changes.

REFERENCES

• 1: Al-Ali, N. Reconstructing Gender: Iraqi women between dictatorship, war, sanctions and occupation. Third World Quarterly, 26, 4(2005), 739--758.
• 2: Barley, S. R. Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31 (1986), 78--108.
• 3: Biernacki, P. Snowball sampling: Problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Soc Methods & Research, 10, 2 (1981), 141--163.
• 4: Martha S. Feldman, Resources in Emerging Structures and Processes of Change, Organization Science, v.15 n.3, p.295-309, June 2004 [doi>10.1287/orsc.1040.0073]
• 5: Martha S. Feldman, Organizational Routines as a Source of Continuous Change, Organization Science, v.11 n.6, p.611-629, November 2000 [doi>10.1287/orsc.11.6.611.12529]
• 6: Freeman, L. C., Romney, A. K, and Freeman, S. C. Cognitive structure and informant accuracy. American Anthropologist, 89, 2 (1987), 310--325.
• 7: Giddens, A. The Constitution of Society, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, (1984).
• 8: Hassan, H. D. Iraq: Tribal structure, social, and political activities. Congressional Research Service Report to Congress. The Library of Congress. (2007). http://assets.opencrs.com/rpts/RS22626_20070315.pdf.
• 9: Kendra, J. and Wachtendorf, T. Elements of resilience after the World Trade Center disaster: Reconstituting New York City's Emergency Operations Centre. Disasters, 27, 1, (2003), 37--53.
• 10: Ann Majchrzak , Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa , Andrea B. Hollingshead, Coordinating Expertise Among Emergent Groups Responding to Disasters, Organization Science, v.18 n.1, p.147-161, January 2007 [doi>10.1287/orsc.1060.0228]
• 11: Wanda J. Orlikowski, Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations, Organization Science, v.11 n.4, p.404-428, July 2000 [doi>10.1287/orsc.11.4.404.14600]
• 12: Leysia Palen , Sophia B. Liu, Citizen communications in crisis: anticipating a future of ICT-supported public participation, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, April 28-May 03, 2007, San Jose, California, USA [doi>10.1145/1240624.1240736]
• 13: Irina A. Shklovski , Scott D. Mainwaring, Exploring technology adoption and use through the lens of residential mobility, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, April 02-07, 2005, Portland, Oregon, USA [doi>10.1145/1054972.1055058]
• 14: Strauss, A. L. and Corbin, J. M. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, (1998).
• 15: Weick, K. E. The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch Disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 4, (1993), 628--52.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  K. Computing Milieux
  K.4 COMPUTERS AND SOCIETY
      K.4.3 Organizational Impacts
          Subjects: Computer-supported collaborative work

General Terms:
Human Factors

Keywords:
collaboration, disrupted environments, resilience, routines