ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Understanding collective play in an urban screen game
Full text PdfPdf (3.26 MB)
Source
Computer Supported Cooperative Work archive
Proceedings of the ACM 2008 conference on Computer supported cooperative work table of contents
San Diego, CA, USA
SESSION: Gaming in the wild table of contents
Pages 67-76  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-007-4
Authors
Kenton O'Hara  CSIRO, Sydney, Australia
Maxine Glancy  BBC, London, United Kingdom
Simon Robertshaw  University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 36,   Downloads (12 Months): 235,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1460563.1460576
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In recent years there has been a growing interest in Urban Screen applications. While there have been several deployments of these technologies in our urban environments, surprisingly little research effort has aimed to explore the detailed material practice of people's engagement and interaction with these urban screen applications. In this paper, we present a study of collaborative game play on large urban displays situated in three city locations in the UK. The study highlights ways in which collaborative play is initiated and coordinated within the context of an urban environment. These experiences are related to physical characteristics of the architectural spaces, the people populating these spaces and the interactive properties of the game itself. The study moves on to discuss issues relating to audience and spectatorship, an inherent feature of interaction in urban environments. The issues of audience and spectatorship are discussed in their own right but also in terms of their relationship to the playing experience. Finally the study considers these interactive experiences in the contexts of being hosted by a professional compere and also with no host present. Through the study we highlight factors to consider in the design of collaborative urban screen applications.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Brignull, H. Rogers, Y. (2003) Enticing People to Interact with Large Public Displays in Public Spaces. In Proceedings of INTERACT' 03, Zurich.
 
2
Brown and O'Hara (2003) Place as a Practical Concern of Mobile Workers. In Environment and Planning A, 35, 1565--1587.
 
3
Button, G. (1993) The curious case of the vanishing technology, In Button, G. (Ed) Technology in Working Order. London: Routledge.
 
4
Castells, M. (1989) The informational city: information technology, economic restructuring, and the urban-regional process. Oxford: Blackwell.
5
 
6
Cottrell, N.B. (1972). Social Facilitation. In C. McClintock (Ed), Experimental Social Psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
 
7
Fatah gen. Schieck, A. (2006) Towards an integrated architectural media space. In First Monday, Special Issue #4: Urban Screens: Discovering the potential of outdoor screens for urban society. http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/special11_2/
 
8
Fatah gen. Schieck, A., Lopez de Vallejo, I. And Penn, A. (2005) Urban Space and Pervasive Systems. In: Proceedings of UbiComp '05, Tokyo, Japan.
 
9
Foucault, M. (1986). Of Other Spaces. In Diacritics, 16(1), 22--27.
 
10
Goffman, E. (1966) Behaviour in Public Places. New York: Free Press.
 
11
Habermas, J. (1989) Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society, (trans. T. Burger with the assistance of F. Lawrence), Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
12
 
13
Heath, C. and D. vom Lehn (2004). "Configuring Reception: (Dis-)Regarding the 'Spectator' in Museums and Galleries." Theory, Culture & Society 21(6), 43--65.
 
14
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
Huang, E. M., Mynatt, E. D., Trimble, J. P. (2006). Displays in the wild: Understanding the dynamics and evolution of a display ecology. In Proceedings of Pervasive 2006, Dublin, Ireland.
 
21
Lave, J. (1999) Everyday Life, Interdisciplinary committee on organisational studies seminar series (ICOS), University of Michigan. Available on the internet at: http://www.si.umich.edu/ICOS/Presentations/041699/
 
22
Lefebvre, H. (1974) The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell.
 
23
Lester, P. M. (2006) Urban screens: The beginning of a universal visual culture. In First Monday, Special Issue #4: Urban Screens: Discovering the potential of outdoor screens for urban society. http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/special11_2/
 
24
Lozano-Hemmer, R. (2002) Alien Relationships with Public Space. In Brouwer, J. and Mulder, A. (Eds) TransUrbanism. NAI Publishers.
 
25
Manovich, L. (2006) The Poetics of Urban Media Surfaces. In First Monday, Special Issue #4: Urban Screens: Discovering the potential of outdoor screens for urban society. http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/special11_2/.
 
26
27
 
28
Struppek, M. (2006) The social potential of Urban Screens. In Visual Communication, 5(2) p. 173--188.
 
29
O'Hara, K. and Kindberg, T. (in press) A study of Coast location-based experience. To appear in Journal of Location Based Services.
30
 
31
32
33
34
35
 
36
Smith, J. A (2006) Digital Dance Hall: The fan culture of dance simulation arcade games. In O'Hara, K. and Brown, B. (Eds) Consuming Music Together: Social and Collaborative Aspects of Music Consumption Technologies. Springer
 
37
Streitz, N., Prante, T., Röcker, C., van Alphen, D. Magerkurth, C., Stenzel, R. and Plewe. D. (2003) Ambient displays and mobile devices for the creation of social architectural spaces. In O'Hara, K., Perry, M., Churchill, E. and Russell, D. (Eds) Public and Situated Displays. Social and Interactional Aspects of Shared Display Technologies. Kluwer.
 
38
Taylor, K. (2006) Programming video art for urban screens in public space. In First Monday, Special Issue #4: Urban Screens: Discovering the potential of outdoor screens for urban society. http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/special11_2/
 
39
Thrift, N. (1996) New urban eras and old technological fears: reconfiguring the goodwill of electronic things. In Urban Studies, 33, 1463--1493.
 
40
Turner, Ralph, and Lewis M. Killian. (1972) Collective Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
 
41
Unwin, T. (2000) A waste of space? Towards a critique of the social production of space. In Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 25, 11--29.
 
42
Urry, J. (2000) Sociology Beyond Societies: Mobilities for the Twenty First Century. London: Routledge.
 
43
Virilio, P. (1997). Open Sky. NY: Verso.
 
44
Cottrell, N. B., Wack, D. L., Sekerak, G. J. and Rittle, R. H. (1968). Social facilitation of dominant responses by presence of others. In Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 245--50.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Kenton O'Hara: colleagues
Maxine Glancy: colleagues
Simon Robertshaw: colleagues