| Robust topology control for indoor wireless sensor networks |
| Full text |
Pdf
(5.44 MB)
|
Source
|
Conference On Embedded Networked Sensor Systems
archive
Proceedings of the 6th ACM conference on Embedded network sensor systems
table of contents
Raleigh, NC, USA
SESSION: Deployment and topology discovery
table of contents
Pages 57-70
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-59593-990-6
|
|
Authors
|
|
Gregory Hackmann
|
Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
|
|
Octav Chipara
|
Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
|
|
Chenyang Lu
|
Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 43, Downloads (12 Months): 400, Citation Count: 0
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
Topology control can reduce power consumption and channel contention in wireless sensor networks by adjusting the transmission power. However, topology control for wireless sensor networks faces significant challenges, especially in indoor environments where wireless characteristics are extremely complex and dynamic. We first provide insights on the design of robust topology control schemes based on an empirical study in an office building. For example, our analysis shows that Received Signal Strength Indicator and Link Quality Indicator are not always robust indicators of Packet Reception Rate in indoor environments due to significant multi-path effects. We then present Adaptive and Robust Topology control (ART), a novel and practical topology control algorithm with several salient features: (1) ART is robust in indoor environments as it does not rely on simplifying assumptions about the wireless properties; (2) ART can adapt to variations in both link quality and contention; (3) ART introduces zero communication overhead for applications which already use acknowledgements. We have implemented ART as a topology layer in TinyOS 2.x. Our topology layer only adds 12 bytes of RAM per neighbor and 1.5 kilobytes of ROM, and requires minimal changes to upper-layer routing protocols. The advantages of ART have been demonstrated through empirical results on a 28-node indoor testbed.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
CC1000 Single Chip Very Low Power RF Transceiver, Texas Instruments.
|
| |
2
|
2.4 GHz IEEE 802.15.4 / ZigBee-ready RF Transceiver, Texas Instruments.
|
| |
3
|
K. Srinivasan and P. Levis, "RSSI is under appreciated," in EmNets, 2006.
|
 |
4
|
Shan Lin , Jingbin Zhang , Gang Zhou , Lin Gu , John A. Stankovic , Tian He, ATPC: adaptive transmission power control for wireless sensor networks, Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems, October 31-November 03, 2006, Boulder, Colorado, USA
[doi> 10.1145/1182807.1182830]
|
| |
5
|
D. Son, B. Krishnamachari, and J. Heidemann, "Experimental study of the effects of transmission power control and blacklisting in wireless sensor networks," in IEEE SECON, 2004.
|
 |
6
|
|
| |
7
|
N. Reijers, G. Halkes, and K. Langendoen, "Link layer measurements in sensor networks," in IEEE MASS, 2004.
|
 |
8
|
Gang Zhou , Tian He , Sudha Krishnamurthy , John A. Stankovic, Impact of radio irregularity on wireless sensor networks, Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services, June 06-09, 2004, Boston, MA, USA
[doi> 10.1145/990064.990081]
|
| |
9
|
D. Lal, A. Manjeshwar, F. Herrmann, E. Uysal-Biyikoglu, and A. Keshavarzian, "Measurement and characterization of link quality metrics in energy constrained wireless sensor networks," in IEEE GLOBECOM, 2003.
|
| |
10
|
D. Ganesan, B. Krishnamachari, A. Woo, D. Culler, D. Estrin, and S. Wicker, "Complex behavior at scale: An experimental study of low-power wireless sensor networks," UCLA Computer Science Department, Tech. Rep., 2002.
|
 |
11
|
|
 |
12
|
Li Li , Joseph Y. Halpern , Paramvir Bahl , Yi-Min Wang , Roger Wattenhofer, Analysis of a cone-based distributed topology control algorithm for wireless multi-hop networks, Proceedings of the twentieth annual ACM symposium on Principles of distributed computing, p.264-273, August 2001, Newport, Rhode Island, United States
[doi> 10.1145/383962.384043]
|
| |
13
|
N. Li, J. C. Hou, and L. Sha, "Design and analysis of an MST-based topology control algorithm," IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 1195--1206, 2005.
|
| |
14
|
|
 |
15
|
Martin Burkhart , Pascal von Rickenbach , Roger Wattenhofer , Aaron Zollinger, Does topology control reduce interference?, Proceedings of the 5th ACM international symposium on Mobile ad hoc networking and computing, May 24-26, 2004, Roppongi Hills, Tokyo, Japan
[doi> 10.1145/989459.989462]
|
| |
16
|
|
| |
17
|
Y. Gao, J. C. Hou, and H. Nguyen, "Topology control for maintaining network connectivity and maximizing network capacity under the physical model," in INFOCOM, 2008.
|
| |
18
|
R. Fonseca, O. Gnawali, K. Jamieson, S. Kim, P. Levis, and A. Woo. The collection tree protocol (CTP). {Online}. Available: http://www.tinyos.net/tinyos-2.x/doc/html/tep123.html
|
 |
19
|
Alberto Cerpa , Jennifer L. Wong , Miodrag Potkonjak , Deborah Estrin, Temporal properties of low power wireless links: modeling and implications on multi-hop routing, Proceedings of the 6th ACM international symposium on Mobile ad hoc networking and computing, May 25-27, 2005, Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA
[doi> 10.1145/1062689.1062741]
|
| |
20
|
{Online}. Available: http://www.tinyos.net/
|
 |
21
|
|
| |
22
|
{Online}. Available: http://www.cse.wustl.edu/wsn/index.php?title=MLA
|
|