ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
IP is dead, long live IP for wireless sensor networks
Full text PdfPdf (1.56 MB)
Source
Conference On Embedded Networked Sensor Systems archive
Proceedings of the 6th ACM conference on Embedded network sensor systems table of contents
Raleigh, NC, USA
SESSION: Networking table of contents
Pages 15-28  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-59593-990-6
Authors
Jonathan W. Hui  University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
David E. Culler  University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
Sponsors
SIGCOMM: ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication
SIGMOBILE: ACM Special Interest Group on Mobility of Systems, Users, Data and Computing
SIGOPS: ACM Special Interest Group on Operating Systems
SIGMETRICS: ACM Special Interest Group on Measurement and Evaluation
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGARCH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Architecture
SIGBED: ACM Special Interest Group on Embedded Systems
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 92,   Downloads (12 Months): 971,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1460412.1460415
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

A decade ago as wireless sensor network research took off many researchers in the field denounced the use of IP as inadequate and in contradiction to the needs of wireless sensor networking. Since then the field has matured, standard links have emerged, and IP has evolved. In this paper, we present the design of a complete IPv6-based network architecture for wireless sensor networks. We validate the architecture with a production-quality implementation that incorporates many techniques pioneered in the sensor network community, including duty-cycled link protocols, header compression, hop-by-hop forwarding, and efficient routing with effective link estimation. In addition to providing interoperability with existing IP devices, this implementation was able to achieve an average duty-cycle of 0.65%, average per-hop latency of 62ms, and a data reception rate of 99.98% over a period of 4 weeks in a real-world home-monitoring application where each node generates one application packet per minute. Our results outperform existing systems that do not adhere to any particular standard or architecture. In light of this demonstration of full IPv6 capability, we review the central arguments that led the field away from IP. We believe that the presence of an architecture, specifically an IPv6-based one, provides a strong foundation for wireless sensor networks going forward.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
R. Albrightson, J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves, and J. Boyle. Eigrp-a fast routing protocol based on distance vectors. 1994.
 
2
ATMForum. LANEmulation over ATMVersion-2 LUNI Specification, Dec. 1995.
3
 
4
 
5
6
7
 
8
 
9
A. Conta, S. Deering, and M. Gupta. Internet control message protocol (icmpv6) for the internet protocol version 6 (ipv6) specification. RFC 4443 (Draft Standard), Mar. 2006. Updated by RFC 4884.
10
 
11
S. Deering, B. Haberman, T. Jinmei, E. Nordmark, and B. Zill. Ipv6 scoped address architecture. RFC 4007 (Proposed Standard), Mar. 2005.
 
12
 
13
14
15
 
16
A. Dunkels, T. Voigt, and J. Alonso. Making TCP/IP Viable for Wireless Sensor Networks. In Proceedings of the First European Workshop on Wireless Sensor Networks (EWSN 2004), work-in-progress session, Berlin, Germany, Jan. 2004.
 
17
 
18
19
 
20
 
21
R. Fonseca, O. Gnawali, K. Jamieson, and P. Levis. Four bit wireless link estimation. In HotNets VI: Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks, 2007.
 
22
M. Gupta and N. Melam. Authentication/Confidentiality for OSPFv3. RFC 4552 (Proposed Standard), June 2006.
23
24
 
25
26
 
27
H. Huo, H. Zhang, Y. Niu, S. Gao, Z. Li, and S. Zhang. Msrlab6: An ipv6 wireless sensor networks testbed. Signal Processing, 2006 8th International Conference on, 4:--, 16--20 2006.
 
28
J. Jubin and J. D. Tornow. The DARPA packet radio network protocols. Proceedings of IEEE, 75(1):21--32, Jan. 1987.
29
 
30
 
31
32
33
 
34
G. Montenegro, N. Kushalnagar, J. Hui, and D. Culler. Transmission of ipv6 packets over ieee 802.15.4 networks. RFC 4944 (Proposed Standard), Sept. 2007.
 
35
T. Narten, E. Nordmark, W. Simpson, and H. Soliman. Neighbor discovery for ip version 6 (ipv6). RFC 4861 (Draft Standard), Sept. 2007.
 
36
37
38
 
39
40
41
 
42
Sensinode. Nanostack. http://sourceforge.net/projects/nanostack/.
43
 
44
K. Szlavecz, A. Terzis, R. MusÇŐloiu-E., J. Cogan, S. Small, S. Ozer, R. Burns, J. Gray, and A. S. Szalay. Life under your feet: An end-to-end soil ecology sensor network, database, web server, and analysis service. Technical Report MSR-TR-2006-90, Microsoft Research, 2006.
 
45
Texas Instruments. Cc2420: 2.4 ghz ieee 802.15.4 / zigbee-ready rf transceiver. http://focus.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/cc2420.pdf, Mar. 2007.
 
46
D. Thaler, M. Talwar, and C. Patel. Neighbor Discovery Proxies (ND Proxy). RFC 4389 (Experimental), Apr. 2006.
 
47
S. Thomson, T. Narten, and T. Jinmei. Ipv6 stateless address autoconfiguration. RFC 4862 (Draft Standard), Sept. 2007.
48
 
49
University of California at Berkeley. Tinyos. http://www.tinyos.net/, 2004.
50
51
52
53
 
54
W. Ye, J. Heidemann, and D. Estrin. An energy-efficient MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks. In 21st Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (INFOCOM), volume 3, pages 1567--1576, June 2002.
55
 
56
ZigBee Alliance. Zigbee. http://www.zigbee.org/.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Jonathan W. Hui: colleagues
David E. Culler: colleagues