ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A salient-point signature for 3d object retrieval
Full text PdfPdf (1.87 MB)
Source
International Multimedia Conference archive
Proceeding of the 1st ACM international conference on Multimedia information retrieval table of contents
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
SESSION: Salient points in multimedia retrieval table of contents
Pages 208-215  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-312-9
Authors
Indriyati Atmosukarto  University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
Linda G. Shapiro  University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
Sponsors
SIGMULTIMEDIA: ACM Special Interest Group on Multimedia
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 12,   Downloads (12 Months): 93,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1460096.1460131
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In this paper we describe a new 3D object signature and evaluate its performance for 3D object retrieval. The signature is based on a learning approach that finds the characteristics of salient points on a 3D object and represents the points in a 2D spatial map based on a longitude-latitude transformation. Experimental results show that the signature is able to achieve good retrieval scores for both pose-normalized and randomly-rotated object queries.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
I. Atmosukarto and L. G. Shapiro. A learning approach to 3D object representation for classification. Submitted to. S+SSPR 2008.
3
 
4
 
5
U. Castellani, M. Cristani, S. Fantoni, and V. Murino. Sparse points matching by combining 3D mesh saliency with statistical descriptors. Computer Graphics Forum 27(2):643--652(10), 2008.
 
6
N. Iyer, S. Jayanti, K. Lou, Y. Kalyanaraman, and K. Ramani. Three-dimensional shape searching: state-of-the-art review and future trends. Computer Aided Design 37:509--530, 2005.
7
 
8
H. Müller, S. Marchand-Maillet, and T. Pun. The truth about corel -evaluation in image retrieval. In CIVR 2002.
 
9
J. Novatnack and K. Nishino. Scale-dependent 3D geometric features. In Proc. International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) 2007.
 
10
 
11
R. Ohbuchi, K. Osada, T. Furuya, and T. Banno. Salient local visual features for shape-based 3D model retrieval. In Shape Modeling International 2008.
 
12
 
13
B. Scholkopf and A. J. Smola. Learning with kernels Cambridge University Press, 2002.
 
14
SHREC 2008. Classification of watertight models track http://shrec.ge.imati.cnr.it/shrec08 classification. html.
 
15
J. Tangelder and R. Veltkamp. A survey of content-based 3D shape retrieval methods. In Shape Modeling International 2004.
 
16
V. V. Vapnik. Statistical Learning Theory John Wiley and Sons, 1998.
 
17
K. Watanabe and A. G. Belyaev. Detection of salient curvature features on polygonal surfaces. Comput. Graph. Forum 20(3), 2001.
 
18

Collaborative Colleagues:
Indriyati Atmosukarto: colleagues
Linda G. Shapiro: colleagues