ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Evaluating field crisping methods for representing spatial prepositions
Full text PdfPdf (231 KB)
Source
Workshop On Geographic Information Retrieval archive
Proceeding of the 2nd international workshop on Geographic information retrieval table of contents
Napa Valley, California, USA
SESSION: Spatial language and GIR table of contents
Pages 9-10  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-253-5
Authors
Mark M. Hall  Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kngdm
Christopher B. Jones  Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kngdm
Sponsors
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
SIGWEB: ACM Special Interest Group on Hypertext, Hypermedia, and Web
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7,   Downloads (12 Months): 54,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1460007.1460019
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

There is a need for GIR systems to interpret the vague aspects of spatial language. Here we describe an initial approach towards evaluating crisp realisations of a field-based model of the use of the spatial preposition "near", based on evidence of usage of the term in image captions.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
M. Kass, A. Witkin, and D. Terzopoulos. Snakes: Active contour models. International Journal of Computer Vision, 1(4):321--331, 1988.
 
2
M. Worboys. Nearness relations in environmental space. International Journal of Geographic Information Science, 15(7):633--651, 2001.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Mark M. Hall: colleagues
Christopher B. Jones: colleagues