ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Spatial autocorrelation and toponym ambiguity
Full text PdfPdf (222 KB)
Source
Workshop On Geographic Information Retrieval archive
Proceeding of the 2nd international workshop on Geographic information retrieval table of contents
Napa Valley, California, USA
SESSION: Geoparsing, scoping, and disambiguation table of contents
Pages 25-26  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-253-5
Authors
Tobias Josef Brunner  University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
Ross Stuart Purves  University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
Sponsors
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
SIGWEB: ACM Special Interest Group on Hypertext, Hypermedia, and Web
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8,   Downloads (12 Months): 76,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1460007.1460013
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we explore the spatial distribution of the referents of ambiguous toponyms and compare it to the distribution of randomly selected unambiguous toponym pairs. We show that for a number of gazetteers, ambiguous toponyms are spatially autocorrelated and that typical autocorrelations are similar to the size of document scopes for a newspaper corpus.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
Overell, S. E. and Rüger, S. 2006- Identifying and grounding descriptions of places. In SIGIR Workshop on Geographic Information Retrieval, 14--16.
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8

Collaborative Colleagues:
Tobias Josef Brunner: colleagues
Ross Stuart Purves: colleagues