ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
MultiPresenter: a presentation system for (very) large display surfaces
Full text PdfPdf (1.53 MB)
Source
International Multimedia Conference archive
Proceeding of the 16th ACM international conference on Multimedia table of contents
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
SESSION: HCM track H1: application table of contents
Pages 519-528  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-303-7
Authors
Joel Lanir  University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
Kellogg S. Booth  University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
Anthony Tang  University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGMULTIMEDIA: ACM Special Interest Group on Multimedia
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 17,   Downloads (12 Months): 109,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1459359.1459428
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We introduce MultiPresenter, a novel presentation system designed to work on very large display spaces (multiple displays or physically large high-resolution displays). MultiPresenter allows presenters to organize and present pre-made and dynamic presentations that take advantage of a very large display space accessed from a personal laptop. Presenters can use the extra space to provide long-term persistency of information to the audience. Our design deliberately separates content generation (authoring) from the presentation of content. We focus on supporting presentation flow and a variety of presentation styles, ranging from automated, scripted sequences of pre-made slides to highly dynamic ad-hoc, and non-linear content. By providing smooth transition between these styles, presenters can easily alter the flow of content during a presentation to adapt to an audience or to change emphasis in response to emerging interests. We describe our goals, rationale and the design process, providing a detailed description of the current version of the system, and discuss our experience using it throughout a one-semester first year computer science course.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
3
4
 
5
Chiu P., Liu Q., Boreczky J., Foote J., Fuse T., Kimber D., Lertsithichai S. and Liao C. Manipulating and Annotating Slides in a Multi-Display Environment. Proceedings of INTERACT'03, 583--590, 2003.
 
6
Doumont J. The Cognitive Style of PowerPoint: Slides Are Not All Evil. Technical Communication, 52, 1, 64--70, 2005.
7
 
8
Dufresne R. J., Gerace W. J., Leonard W. J., Mestre J. P. and Wenk L. Classtalk: A classroom communication system for active learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 7, 2, 3--47, 1996.
 
9
Farkas D. K., Toward a better understanding of PowerPoint deck design. Information Design Journal, 14, 2, 162--171, 2006.
 
10
Friedland G., Knipping L., Schulte J. and Tapia E. E-Chalk: a lecture recording system using the chalkboard metaphor. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 1, 9--20, 2004.
11
12
13
 
14
Kjeldsen J. E., The Rhetoric of PowerPoint. Seminar.net, 2, 1, 2006.
 
15
16
17
 
18
Levasseur D. G., Sawyer K. J. Pedagogy meets PowerPoint: A research review of the effects of computer-generated slides in the classroom. The Review of Communication 6:1-2, 101--123, 2006.
 
19
Meyer, R. E., Multimedia Learning. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, 2003.
20
21
 
22
Norman D., In defense of PowerPoint. http://www.jnd.org/dn.mss/in_defense_of_p.html, Posted at 2004.
 
23
Norvig P., The Gettysburg Powerpoint Presentation. http://www.norvig.com/Gettysburg/index.htm N/A, Posted at 2000.
 
24
Ossanna, J. F., UNIX Programmer's Manual (Second ed.), Volume 2b, Chapter Nroff/troff User's Manual. Bell Laboratories. 1978.
 
25
Parker I. Absolute PowerPoint. The New Yorker, 28, 76--87. 2001.
26
 
27
Ratto M., Shapiro R. B., Truong T. M. and Griswold W. G., The ActiveClass Project: Experiments in Encouraging Classroom Participation. Computer Support for Collaborative Learning, 2003.
 
28
29
 
30
Shwom B. L. and Keller K. P. 'The Great Man Has Spoken. Now What Do I Do?' A Response to Edward R. Tufte's The Cognitive Style of PowerPoint. Communication Partners, 1, 1, 2003.
 
31
Stewart T. A. Ban it now! Friends don't let friends use PowerPoint. Fortune, 143, 210, 2001.
 
32
 
33
 
34


Collaborative Colleagues:
Joel Lanir: colleagues
Kellogg S. Booth: colleagues
Anthony Tang: colleagues