ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Locality condensation: a new dimensionality reduction method for image retrieval
Full text PdfPdf (324 KB)
Source
International Multimedia Conference archive
Proceeding of the 16th ACM international conference on Multimedia table of contents
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
SESSION: Content track C6: image retrieval table of contents
Pages 219-228  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-303-7
Authors
Zi Huang  The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
Heng Tao Shen  The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
Jie Shao  The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
Stefan Rüger  The Open University, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom
Xiaofang Zhou  The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGMULTIMEDIA: ACM Special Interest Group on Multimedia
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 21,   Downloads (12 Months): 148,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1459359.1459389
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Content-based image similarity search plays a key role in multimedia retrieval. Each image is usually represented as a point in a high-dimensional feature space. The key challenge of searching similar images from a large database is the high computational overhead due to the "curse of dimensionality". Reducing the dimensionality is an important means to tackle the problem. In this paper, we study dimensionality reduction for top-k image retrieval. Intuitively, an effective dimensionality reduction method should not only preserve the close locations of similar images (or points), but also separate those dissimilar ones far apart in the reduced subspace. Existing dimensionality reduction methods mainly focused on the former. We propose a novel idea called Locality Condensation (LC) to not only preserve localities determined by neighborhood information and their global similarity relationship, but also ensure that different localities will not invade each other in the low-dimensional subspace. To generate non-overlapping localities in the subspace, LC first performs an elliptical condensation, which condenses each locality with an elliptical shape into a more compact hypersphere to enlarge the margins among different localities and estimate the projection in the subspace for overlap analysis. Through a convex optimization, LC further performs a scaling condensation on the obtained hyperspheres based on their projections in the subspace with minimal condensation degrees. By condensing the localities effectively, the potential overlaps among different localities in the low-dimensional subspace are prevented. Consequently, for similarity search in the subspace, the number of false hits (i.e., distant points that are falsely retrieved) will be reduced. Extensive experimental comparisons with existing methods demonstrate the superiority of our proposal.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Y. Bengio, J.-F. Paiement, P. Vincent, O. Delalleau, N. L. Roux, and M. Ouimet. Out-of-sample extensions for lle, isomap, mds, eigenmaps, and spectral clustering. In NIPS, 2003.
3
 
4
5
6
7
 
8
 
9
V. de Silva and J. B. Tenenbaum. Global versus local methods in nonlinear dimensionality reduction. In NIPS, pages 705--712, 2002.
 
10
S. C. Deerwester, S. T. Dumais, T. K. Landauer, G. W. Furnas, and R. A. Harshman. Indexing by latent semantic analysis. Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 41(6):391--407, 1990.
 
11
C. Elkan. Using the triangle inequality to accelerate k-means. In ICML, pages 147--153, 2003.
12
 
13
14
15
 
16
X. He and P. Niyogi. Locality preserving projections. In NIPS, 2003.
17
 
18
A. Hyvärinen, J. Karhunen, and E. Oja. Independent Component Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, 2001.
19
 
20
I. T. Jolliffe. Principal Component Analysis. Springer-Verlag, second edition, 2002.
 
21
 
22
K. Mikolajczyk and J. Matas. Improving descriptors for fast tree matching by optimal linear projection. In ICCV, 2007.
 
23
S. T. Roweis and L. K. Saul. Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding. Science, 290(5500):2323--2326, 2000.
 
24
 
25
J. B. Tenenbaum, V. d. Silva, and J. C. Langford. A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction. Science, 290(5500):2319--2323, 2000.
 
26
M. E. Tipping and C. M. Bishop. Probabilistic principal component analysis. Journal of The Royal Statistical Society Series B, 61(3):611--622, 1999.
 
27
28
 
29
A. Yavlinsky, E. Schofield, and S. M. Rüger. Automated image annotation using global features and robust nonparametric density estimation. In CIVR, pages 507--517, 2005.
 
30
F. W. Young and R. M. Hamer. Multidimensional Scaling: History, Theory and Applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1987.
31
32

Collaborative Colleagues:
Zi Huang: colleagues
Heng Tao Shen: colleagues
Jie Shao: colleagues
Stefan Rüger: colleagues
Xiaofang Zhou: colleagues