ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Automatic scoring of online discussion posts
Full text PdfPdf (115 KB)
Source
Conference on Information and Knowledge Management archive
Proceeding of the 2nd ACM workshop on Information credibility on the web table of contents
Napa Valley, California, USA
SESSION: Analyzing social networks and discussion forums table of contents
Pages 19-26  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-259-7
Authors
Nayer Wanas  Cairo Microsoft Innovation Center, Abourawsh, Giza, Egypt
Motaz El-Saban  Cairo Microsoft Innovation Center, Abourawash, Giza, Egypt
Heba Ashour  Cairo Microsoft Innovation Center, Abourawash, Giza, Egypt
Waleed Ammar  Cairo Microsoft Innovation Center, Abourawash, Giza, Egypt
Sponsors
SIGWEB: ACM Special Interest Group on Hypertext, Hypermedia, and Web
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 28,   Downloads (12 Months): 201,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1458527.1458534
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Online discussions forums, known as forums for short, are conversational social cyberspaces constituting rich repositories of content and an important source of collaborative knowledge. However, most of this knowledge is buried inside the forum infrastructure and its extraction is both complex and difficult. The ability to automatically rate postings in online discussion forums, based on the value of their contribution, enhances the ability of users to find knowledge within this content. Several key online discussion forums have utilized collaborative intelligence to rate the value of postings made by users. However, a large percentage of posts go unattended and hence lack appropriate rating.

In this paper, we focus on automatic rating of postings in online discussion forums. A set of features derived from the posting content and the threaded discussion structure are generated for each posting. These features are grouped into five categories, namely (i) relevance, (ii) originality, (iii) forum-specific features, (iv) surface features, and (v) posting-component features. Using a non-linear SVM classifier, the value of each posting is categorized into one of three levels High, Medium, or Low. This rating represents a seed value for each posting that is leveraged in filtering forum content. Experimental results have shown promising performance on forum data.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
Chang, C., and Lin, C. 2001. LibSVM: a library for support vector machines. Software available at http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~cjlin/libsvm.
 
3
Dikli, S., 2006. An Overview of Automatic Scoring of Essays. The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, Vol 5(1) August 2006, 3--35.
4
 
5
6
7
8
9
 
10
Lui, A., Li, S., and Choy, S. 2007. An Evaluation of Automatic Text Categorization in Online Discussion Analysis. In Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (Niigata, Japan, July 18-20, 2007) ICALT 2007, IEEE Computer Society Press, New Jersey, NJ, 205--209
 
11
Weimer, M., Gurevych, I., and Mühlhäuser, M. 2007. Automatically Assessing the Post Quality in Online Discussions on Software. In Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Prague, Czech Republic, June 23-30, 2007). ACL2007 Volume P07-2, 125--128.
 
12
Wu, Q., Burges, C. Svore, K, and Gao, J, 2008, Ranking, Boosting, and Model Adaptation, Technical Report, MSR-TR-2008-109, Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, August 2008.
 
13


Collaborative Colleagues:
Nayer Wanas: colleagues
Motaz El-Saban: colleagues
Heba Ashour: colleagues
Waleed Ammar: colleagues