| Quantify music artist similarity based on style and mood |
| Full text |
Pdf
(207 KB)
|
Source
|
Workshop On Web Information And Data Management
archive
Proceeding of the 10th ACM workshop on Web information and data management
table of contents
Napa Valley, California, USA
SESSION: Ranking and similarity search
table of contents
Pages 119-124
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-260-3
|
|
Authors
|
|
Bo Shao
|
Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
|
|
Tao Li
|
Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
|
|
Mitsunori Ogihara
|
University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8, Downloads (12 Months): 89, Citation Count: 0
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
Music artist similarity has been an active research topic in music information retrieval for a long time since it is especially useful for music recommendation and organization. However, it is a difficult problem. The similarity varies significantly due to different artistic aspects considered and most importantly, it is hard to quantify. In this paper, we propose a new framework for quantifying artist similarity. In the framework, we focus on style and mood aspects of artists whose descriptions are extracted from the authoritative information available at the All Music Guide website. We then generate style--mood joint taxonomies using hierarchical co-clustering algorithm, and quantify the semantic similarities between the style/mood terms based on the taxonomy structure and the positions of these terms in the taxonomies. Finally we calculate the artist similarities according to all the style/mood terms used to describe them. Experiments are conducted to show the effectiveness of our framework.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
P. Berkhin. Survey of clustering data mining techniques. Technical report, Accrue Software, San Jose, CA, 2002.
|
| |
4
|
H. Cho, I. Dhillon, Y. Guan, and S. Sra. Minimum sum squared residue co-clustering of gene expression data. In Proceedings of The 4th SIAM Data Mining Conference, pages 22--24, April 2004.
|
 |
5
|
Bo Long , Xiaoyun Wu , Zhongfei (Mark) Zhang , Philip S. Yu, Unsupervised learning on k-partite graphs, Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, August 20-23, 2006, Philadelphia, PA, USA
[doi> 10.1145/1150402.1150439]
|
 |
6
|
|
 |
7
|
|
 |
8
|
Hongyuan Zha , Xiaofeng He , Chris Ding , Horst Simon , Ming Gu, Bipartite graph partitioning and data clustering, Proceedings of the tenth international conference on Information and knowledge management, October 05-10, 2001, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
[doi> 10.1145/502585.502591]
|
| |
9
|
J. R. A. Schlicker, F. S. Domingues and T. Lengauer. A new measure for functional similarity of gene products based on gene ontology. In BMC Bioinformatics, volume 7, pages 302--317, June 2006.
|
| |
10
|
A. B. D Ellis, B Whitman and S. Lawrence. The quest for ground truth in musical artist similarity. In ISMIR, 2002.
|
| |
11
|
J. J. Jiang and D. W. Conrath. Semantic similarity based on corpus statistics and lexical taxonomy. In In ROCLING X, 1997.
|
| |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
P. Resnik. Using information content to evaluate semantic similarity in a taxanomy. In IJCAI, 1995.
|
| |
14
|
G. Tzanetakis and P. Cook. Music genre classification of audio signals. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, 10(5):293--302, 2002.
|
| |
15
|
A. Uitdenbogerd and R. van Schyndel. A review of factors affecting music recommender success. In ISMIR, 2002.
|
 |
16
|
|
| |
17
|
J. Foote and S. Uchihashi. The beat spectrum: a new approach to rhythm analysis. In IEEE ICME, 2001.
|
| |
18
|
B. Logan and A. Salomon. A content-based music similarity function. Technical Report CRL 2001/02, Cambrige Research Laboratory, June 2001.
|
| |
19
|
T. Li and M. Ogihara. Towards Intelligent Music Retrieval. In IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 8(3): 564--574 (2006).
|
 |
20
|
|
|