ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Managing collaborative feedback information for distributed retrieval
Full text PdfPdf (488 KB)
Source
Conference on Information and Knowledge Management archive
Proceeding of the 2008 ACM workshop on Large-Scale distributed systems for information retrieval table of contents
Napa Valley, California, USA
SESSION: Potpourri table of contents
Pages 27-34  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-254-2
Authors
Pascal Felber  Université de Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland
Toan Luu  Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
Martin Rajman  Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
Etienne Riviere  Université de Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland
Sponsors
SIGWEB: ACM Special Interest Group on Hypertext, Hypermedia, and Web
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 67,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1458469.1458479
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Despite the many research efforts invested recently in peer-to-peer search engines, none of the proposed system has reached the level of quality and efficiency of their centralized counterpart. One of the main reasons for this inferior performance is the difficulty to attract a critical mass of users that would make the peer-to-peer system truly competitive. We argue that decentralized search mechanisms should not aim at replacing existing engines, but instead complement them by adding novel functionalities that would be difficult to provide in a centralized manner. This paper introduces an example of such a complementary search mechanism and presents the design of a distributed collaborative system for leveraging user feedback and document/user profiling information.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
 
3
M. Bender, S. Michel, G. Weikum, and C. Zimmer. The Minerva project: Database selection in the context of p2p search. Datenbanksysteme in Business, Technologie und Web, 65:125--144, 2005.
4
 
5
A. Broder and M. Mitzenmacher. Network applications of bloom filters: A survey. Internet Mathematics, 1(4):485--509, 2003.
 
6
F. Dabek, B. Zhao, P. Druschel, J. Kubiatowicz, and I. Stoica. Towards a common api for structured peer-to-peer overlays. In Proc. of IPTPS'03, Berkeley, CA, Feb. 2003.
 
7
H. Gylfason, O. Khan, and G. Schoenebeck. Chora: Expert-based p2p web search. In Proc. of AAMAS'06, Hakodate, Japan, May 2006.
8
 
9
M. Henzinger. Search Technologies for the Internet. Science, 317(5837):468--471, 2007.
 
10
F. Klemm and K. Aberer. Aggregation of a term vocabulary for peer-to-peer information retrieval: a dht stress test. In Proc. of DBISP2P'05, Trondheim, Norway, 2005.
 
11
J. Li, B. Loo, J. Hellerstein, F. Kaashoek, D. Karger, and R. Morris. The feasibility of peer-to-peer web indexing and search. In Proc. of IPTPS'03, Berkeley, CA, 2003.
 
12
N. Lopes and C. Baquero. Taming hot-spots in dht inverted indexes. In Proc. of LSDS-IR'07, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2007.
13
14
15
 
16
 
17
18
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
T. Suel, C. Mathur, J.-W. Wu, J. Zhang, A. Delis, M. Kharrazi, X. Long, and K. Shanmugasundaram. Odissea: A peer-to-peer architecture for scalable web search and information retrieval. In Proc. of WebDB'03, Suzhoum, China, 2003.
23
24

Collaborative Colleagues:
Pascal Felber: colleagues
Toan Luu: colleagues
Martin Rajman: colleagues
Etienne Riviere: colleagues