ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Ranking information resources in peer-to-peer text retrieval: an experimental study
Full text PdfPdf (237 KB)
Source
Conference on Information and Knowledge Management archive
Proceeding of the 2008 ACM workshop on Large-Scale distributed systems for information retrieval table of contents
Napa Valley, California, USA
SESSION: Similarity search and resource selection table of contents
Pages 75-82  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-254-2
Author
Hans F. Witschel  University of Leipzig, Institut f. Informatik, Leipzig, Germany
Sponsors
SIGWEB: ACM Special Interest Group on Hypertext, Hypermedia, and Web
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7,   Downloads (12 Months): 66,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1458469.1458476
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper experimentally studies approaches to the problem of ranking information resources w.r.t. user queries in peer-to-peer information retrieval. In distributed environments, for each given user query and a set of information resources that are available, we need to select the right subset of these resources to forward the query to. Here, we study the problem of pruning descriptions of resources to acceptable lengths in a peer-to-peer scenario and two approaches to overcome the mismatch problem that may arise as a consequence of the pruning, namely query expansion and learning better resource descriptions from query streams. The results show that resource descriptions can be pruned to a large extent without ill effects and that learning better descriptions from query streams works much better than query expansion.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
 
3
 
4
J. Broekstra, M. Ehrig, P. Haase, F. van Harmelen,M. Menken, P. Mika, B. Schnizler, and R. Siebes. Bibster - A Semantics-Based Bibliographic Peer-to-Peer System. In Proceedings of SemPGRID '04, 2nd Workshop on Semantics in Peer-to-Peer and Grid Computing, pages 3--22, 2004.
 
5
J. Callan. Distributed Information Retrieval. In W.B. Croft, editor, Advances in Information Retrieval, pages 127--150. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000.
6
7
 
8
S. Chernov, P. Serdyukov, M. Bender, S. Michel, G. Weikum, and C. Zimmer. Database Selection and Result Merging in P2P Web Search. In Third International Workshop on Databases, Information Systems and Peer-to-Peer Computing (DBISP2P 2005), 2005.
 
9
10
 
11
Gnutella. The Gnutella Protocol Specification v0.4. Available from www9.limewire.com/developer/gnutella protocol 0.4.pdf, 2001.
12
13
 
14
15
 
16
A. Z. Kronfol. FASD: A Fault-tolerant, Adaptive, Scalable, Distributed Search Engine, 2002.
 
17
A. Loeser, S. Staab, and C. Tempich. Semantic Social Overlay Networks. IEEE JSAC - Journal on Selected Areas in Communication, 25(1):5--14, 2007.
18
19
20
21
 
22
S. E. Robertson, S. Walker, M. Hancock-Beaulieu, A. Gull, and M. Lau. Okapi at TREC-3. In Proceedings of TREC-3, pages 21--30, 1992.
 
23
S. Saroiu, P. Gummadi, and S. Gribble. A Measurement Study of Peer-to-Peer File Sharing Systems. In Proceedings of Multimedia Computing and Networking, 2002.
24
25
 
26
 
27
H.F. Witschel, F. Holz, G. Heinrich, and S. Teresniak. An Evaluation Measure for Distributed Information Retrieval Systems. In Proceedings of ECIR'08, 2008.
 
28
L.-S. Wu, R. Akavipat, and F. Menczer. 6S: Distributing crawling and searching across Web peers. In Proceedings of WTAS2005, 2005.
29
30